Teams

X40 6.0 GR Bortz

2026 NEOTA Mixed 40 & Over · NEOTA 6.0 40&O Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 2.88 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-05-03vs X40 6.0 NC1 DowdLost 02
L#2 DoublesTammy Iams / John Ragner vs Michael Curtis / Marie Wagner0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesBen Gobrogge / Brandy Gobrogge vs Skip Dowd / Desiree' Dowd1-6, 4-6
2026-04-26vs X40 6.0 PM2 TopleSplit 11
W#2 DoublesTammy Iams / John Ragner vs Laura Rucker / Christopher Rucker6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesLisa Bortz / T Bortz vs Julie Pulk / John Kalas7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2026-04-12vs X40 6.0 TP DeanLost 03
L#1 DoublesHeidi MacLane-Hodges / John Ragner vs Frank Licari / Susan Lowery-O'Connell2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesJohn Beese / Val Belcher vs Christopher Peters / Gina Myers4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBrandy Gobrogge / Ben Gobrogge vs Arthur Busch / Susan Busch7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2026-04-10vs X40 6.0 PM2 TopleLost 12
W#1 DoublesVal Belcher / Elbert Enrique vs Lindsay Tadsen / Marko Savic6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTammy Iams / John Beese vs Jennifer Tople / Edward Tople4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLisa Bortz / T Bortz vs Laura Rucker / Christopher Rucker1-6, 6-2, 0-1
2026-03-29vs X40 6.0 NC1 DowdSplit 11
W#1 DoublesElbert Enrique / Val Belcher vs Desiree' Dowd / Skip Dowd6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesBen Gobrogge / Brandy Gobrogge vs Brad Shepherd / Megan Pellegrino3-6, 1-6
2026-03-15vs X40 6.0 TP DeanLost 03
L#1 DoublesJohn Ragner / Heidi MacLane-Hodges vs William Fox / Gina Myers7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesT Bortz / Lisa Bortz vs Timothy Patterson / Tiffanie Brown5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJohn Beese / Tammy Iams vs Sean O'donnell / Michelle Fox7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2026-03-08vs X40 6.0 NC1 DowdSplit 11
W#1 DoublesVal Belcher / Elbert Enrique vs Megan Lynch / Allan Lynch6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesBrandy Gobrogge / Ben Gobrogge vs Megan Pellegrino / Brad Shepherd7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2026-03-01vs X40 6.0 PM2 TopleSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJohn Ragner / Tammy Iams vs Tavi Muresan / Lindsay Tadsen5-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesLisa Bortz / T Bortz vs John Kalas / Jen Sharp4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-02-22vs X40 6.0 TP DeanLost 12
L#1 DoublesElbert Enrique / Heidi MacLane-Hodges vs William Fox / Karen Lahovich4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesBen Gobrogge / Brandy Gobrogge vs Ron Novak / Kim Dean1-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesJohn Beese / Val Belcher vs Sean O'donnell / Michelle Fox6-4, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings14 teams · NEOTA 6.0 40&O Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1X40 6.0 MV1 Herbruck8222822232
2X40 6.0 PW Lonsway82201026214
3X40 6.0 PM1 Shaffer6320719188
4X40 6.0 LT Quist63171023198
5X40 6.0 NC1 Dowd6318924222
6X40 6.0 TP Dean54151230264
7X40 6.0 PM2 Tople54121535277
8X40 6.0 MV2 Wu55151536266
9X40 6.0 NC2 Pence45131432245
10X40 6.0 CV Poe46151533268
11X40 6.0 WE Woodruff37131740292
12X40 6.0 GR Bortz2791840291
13X40 6.0 AS Philippon2742347292
14X40 6.0 MM Bode2852554341

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.60 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.89
Val Belcher
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.85
Heidi MacLane-Hodges
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.70
John Ragner
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.69
Elbert Enrique
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.67
Ben Gobrogge
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.64
Lisa Bortz
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.52
T Bortz
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.49
John Beese
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.48
Tammy Iams
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.06
Brandy Gobrogge
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ben Gobrogge + Brandy Gobrogge1837% games−2.4% vs expected
Tammy Iams + John Ragner2840% games−2.6% vs expected
T Bortz + Lisa Bortz31239% games−12.6% vs expected
Heidi MacLane-Hodges + Elbert Enrique4353% gamesnot enough data
Tammy Iams + John Beese1540% gamesnot enough data
John Ragner + Val Belcher2441% gamesnot enough data
John Ragner + Heidi MacLane-Hodges1447% gamesnot enough data
Elbert Enrique + Val Belcher3252% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Val Belcher
60W–75L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
2.89
3
Heidi MacLane-Hodges
118W–143L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%87%12%
2.85
John Ragner
28W–49L career · 5 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Elbert Enrique
34W–46L career · 6 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
2.69
3
Ben Gobrogge
10W–28L career · 5 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.67
Lisa Bortz
44W–102L career · 4 lines in 2026
15%85%<1%
2.64
T Bortz
31W–88L career · 4 lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
2.52
John Beese
13W–39L career · 4 lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
2.49
Tammy Iams
65W–152L career · 5 lines in 2026
56%44%<1%
2.48
2.5
Brandy Gobrogge
6W–28L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.06

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.