← Teams

THPRD-Reese/Ellis

2025 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.44 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Nancy Atkins
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.23
Sandy Swift
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.11
Bernadette Lisac
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.06
Susie Garland
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.04
Ann Cassin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.00
Kerry Sanford
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.96
Gina Ariosa
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.87
Jeny Joseph
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3
Results8 ties
2024-11-23Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesAnn Cassin / Beth Kempton vs Kristen Fisher / Victoria Cartwright6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesSandra Ellis / Susie Garland vs Shelly Perkins / Elicia Putnam7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesGina Ariosa / Jeny Joseph vs Maureen Mader / Cricket Forsey6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2024-11-17Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesNancy Atkins / Mary Jesse vs Kaie Wellman / Miriam Habafy6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesBernadette Lisac / Sandra Ellis vs Christine Bennett-Hanes / Shawn Sefchick6-1, 6-3
2024-11-09Won 2–0
W#2 DoublesGina Ariosa / Jeny Joseph vs Kimbra Kasch / Christine Egan6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMary Jesse / Ann Cassin vs Michelle DeVaughn / Dar Dragoon6-2, 6-1
2024-10-19Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesNancy Atkins / Jeny Joseph vs Ann Arp / Shawn Sefchick6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesGina Ariosa / Ann Cassin vs Jeanette Thomas / Jean Zuber Marshburn6-3, 6-2
2024-10-11Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesNancy Atkins / Mary Jesse vs Kristi Tompkins / Leanne Kong7-6, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAnn Cassin / Susie Garland vs Carolyn Schilling / Debra Hall6-4, 7-5
2024-10-05Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesNancy Atkins / Mary Jesse vs Janet Dowty / TERESA LAWHEAD6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesBernadette Lisac / Sandy Swift vs Cathy Koerner / Caroline Hall6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJan Funkhouser / Kerry Sanford vs Elizabeth Burns / Sarah Grewe6-0, 6-2
2024-09-28Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesSandy Swift / Bernadette Lisac vs Karen Groenweghe / Sammie Sue Willenborg6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesSandra Ellis / Jeny Joseph vs Christine Wall / Carole Bell6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesSharon Reese / Susie Garland vs Tara Guimont / Jennifer Wiencek6-1, 6-2
2024-09-13Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesJoanne Maginnis / Kerry Sanford vs Donna Feuerherdt / Lucila Griesser4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSandra Ellis / Bernadette Lisac vs Linda Graham / Lisa McBee6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBeth Kempton / Gina Ariosa vs Nancy Kane / Cricket Forsey3-6, 6-0, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Nancy Atkins
79W–82L career
38%62%0%
3.49
3.5
Sandy Swift
45W–49L career
6%92%2%
3.23
3.5
Bernadette Lisac
21W–28L career
12%88%0%
3.11
3.5
Susie Garland
37W–56L career
25%75%0%
3.06
3.5
Ann Cassin
45W–69L career
26%74%0%
3.04
3.5
Kerry Sanford
22W–32L career · type A
40%60%0%
3.00
3
Gina Ariosa
24W–46L career
0%80%20%
2.96
3
Jeny Joseph
75W–91L career
0%98%2%
2.87

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.