Teams

Albus

2024 FW Tri-Level · Womens 3.5-4.0-4.5

9 players · average NTRP 4.50 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-11-03vs Double the FunWon 30
W#1 DoublesCaroline Baden / Stephanie Prats vs Hannah Walsh / Aubrey Findley7-6
W#2 DoublesPamela Kvale / Kimberly Grogan vs Amy Dabbous / Jennifer Gibson6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesHolly Friedman / Kirti Kale vs Lynn Jumper / Rebecca Kolo6-0, 6-2
2024-11-02vs LeeWon 30
W#1 DoublesCaroline Baden / Mariajose Alvarez vs Kalisha Lee / Bridget Sanderfer7-5, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKerry Schonwald / Melissa Reilly vs Karin Fisher / Mesha Taylor6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTeresa Albus / Holly Friedman vs Debbie Greenwood / Kay Gaskill6-4, 6-3
2024-11-01vs CooperWon 21
L#1 DoublesStephanie Prats / Pamela Kvale vs Emarely Rosa-Davila / Marcela Serna2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKerry Schonwald / Mariajose Alvarez vs Theresa Batoon / Sonia Redwine6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTeresa Albus / Kirti Kale vs Paula Cooper / Maria Saenz6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Womens 3.5-4.0-4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.87 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.10
Kerry Schonwald
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.04
Caroline Baden
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.00
Stephanie Prats
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.87
Kimberly Grogan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.80
Pamela Kvale
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.79
Kirti Kale
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.71
Teresa Albus
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Melissa Reilly
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Mariajose Alvarez
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pamela Kvale + Kimberly Grogan16556% games+8.0% vs expected
Teresa Albus + Kimberly Grogan31146% games−2.9% vs expected
Mariajose Alvarez + Kerry Schonwald10557% gamesnot enough data
Melissa Reilly + Kirti Kale213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kerry Schonwald
43W–37L career · 2 lines in 2024
21%78%<1%
4.10
4.5
Caroline Baden
20W–17L career · 2 lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
4.04
Stephanie Prats
6W–10L career · 2 lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
4.00
Kimberly Grogan
62W–50L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%83%16%
3.87
Pamela Kvale
51W–49L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.80
Kirti Kale
23W–10L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.79
Teresa Albus
32W–27L career · 2 lines in 2024
5%94%1%
3.71
Melissa Reilly
32W–7L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%16%84%
3.63
Mariajose Alvarez
37W–21L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.