Teams

GEPTA-4.0-Adult/18+W(Hufft)(FB)

SouthernNewMexico · 2025 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

15 players · average NTRP 3.79 / GEPTA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2025 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Cheryl Ledford
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.71
Carol Shannon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.71
Cindy Blackman
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 4
3.55
Amelia Pilcher
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.32
Helga Sauza
usually #1 Singles 47%, also #3 Doubles 24% · published 3.5
3.27
Gerla Gallardo
usually #2 Doubles 53%, also #1 Doubles 39% · published 3.5
3.09
Chrissy Segaline
usually #3 Doubles 73%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published 3.5
Lia Shelton
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #1 Singles 22% · published
Melissa Hufft
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 19% · published
Monica Morga
usually #1 Doubles 54%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Patricia Dalbin
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 37% · published
Rebecca Loweree
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Rossana Roacho
usually #3 Doubles 41%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Ynez Sanchez
published
Yolanda Zuverza
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Singles 22% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Monica Morga + Rebecca Loweree101150% games+1.1% vs expected
Rossana Roacho + Patricia Dalbin33860% games−1.0% vs expected
Amelia Pilcher + Cindy Blackman4448% gamesnot enough data
Gerla Gallardo + Patricia Dalbin2446% gamesnot enough data
Carol Shannon + Amelia Pilcher1443% gamesnot enough data
Carol Shannon + Lia Shelton404 matchesnot enough data
Gerla Gallardo + Rossana Roacho134 matchesnot enough data
Yolanda Zuverza + Melissa Hufft314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cheryl Ledford
37W–52L career · 14 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Carol Shannon
58W–62L career · 8 lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Cindy Blackman
45W–47L career · 10 lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Amelia Pilcher
28W–38L career · 9 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.55
3.5
Helga Sauza
76W–39L career · 32 lines in 2025
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Gerla Gallardo
96W–61L career · 36 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Chrissy Segaline
21W–58L career · 11 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.09
Lia Shelton
144W–91L career · 35 lines in 2025
not enough data
Melissa Hufft
98W–71L career · 21 lines in 2025
not enough data
Monica Morga
70W–73L career · 24 lines in 2025
not enough data
Patricia Dalbin
95W–70L career · 35 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rebecca Loweree
57W–51L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rossana Roacho
118W–114L career · 39 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ynez Sanchez
8W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Yolanda Zuverza
53W–49L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.