Teams

OC All the Single Ladies - CMTC - Tricia - Sun1

OC Fall Team Singles · OC 4.0W

9 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 SinglesRandi Lloyd vs Kayla Friedland2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesYen Poon vs Vivian Ly1-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesTrisha Coy vs Genesis Arreola1-6, 0-6
2025-10-26vs OC Team Courage - Nisha - Sun9Won 10
W#2 SinglesRachel Om vs Alicia Carlin6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesRachel Om vs Sofia Ochoa7-6, 6-2
W#1 SinglesLorri Watson vs Nicole Festini7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesGia Bao Le vs Gladys Tan6-0, 7-6
W#3 SinglesTrisha Coy vs Sabrina Wedge6-0, 6-3
2025-10-05vs OC Team Courage - Nisha - Sun9Lost 12
L#1 SinglesGia Bao Le vs Daniela Schardinger6-7, 0-6
L#2 SinglesJazmin Rubio vs Alicia Carlin1-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesRandi Lloyd vs Nisha Anish6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesRandi Lloyd vs Sofia Ochoa6-2, 6-1
L#2 SinglesTrisha Coy vs Eunice Han4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 SinglesMartha Cordova vs Cathy Xing6-2, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC 4.0W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Rachel Om
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4
3.82
Yen Poon
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.71
Randi Lloyd
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
3.67
Martha Cordova
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.56
Gia Bao Le
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.55
Lorri Watson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.54
Jazmin Rubio
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.42
Trisha Coy
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.36
Tricia Bregman
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gia Bao Le + Rachel Om123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Rachel Om
164W–64L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%56%43%
3.98
Yen Poon
13W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
Randi Lloyd
10W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
Martha Cordova
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
Gia Bao Le
15W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
3.56
Lorri Watson
6W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.55
Jazmin Rubio
0W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.54
Trisha Coy
9W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Tricia Bregman
114W–117L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.36

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.