Teams

The Racket Horror Picture Show

2025 Tri Level Women · 4.0,3.5,3.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / WESTERN REGION

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-04-12vs GoldbergLost 01
L#3 DoublesHalli Sparks / Kelsey Pierce vs Jean Sabourin / Allyson Mead2-6, 5-7
2025-03-30vs RadoffLost 12
L#1 DoublesCarolyn Greenwald / Vivian Zayas vs Ainslie Ellis / Katelyn Nguyen3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAija Leiponen / Kuniko Okada vs Melody Fredrickson / Sue VanderMeer6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKyoungsoo Lee / Jenna Holmes vs Deborah Severino / Anita Pudusseri4-6, 6-7
2025-03-23vs SYR: Get a GripLost 02
L#2 DoublesJenna Holmes / Ashley Paolangeli vs Donna Hack / Heidi Howard3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesHalli Sparks / Susan Cole vs Valerie Clarke / Andrea Elliott3-6, 1-6
2025-03-22vs Chan- DrumlinsWon 20
W#1 DoublesCarolyn Greenwald / Kuniko Okada vs Anne Brandt / Kris Chan6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJenny Barnett / Emily Madan vs Nancy Radoff / Sharon Gerber7-5, 6-3
2025-03-16vs GoldbergWon 20
W#2 DoublesVivian Zayas / Ashley Paolangeli vs Veronica Hotaling / Stephanie Thompson5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKelsey Pierce / Kyoungsoo Lee vs Allyson Mead / Karen Snyder6-4, 7-5
2025-03-09vs RadoffWon 20
W#2 DoublesEmily Madan / Ashley Paolangeli vs Andra Lee / Lauren Maring6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSusan Cole / Halli Sparks vs Maiken Westergaard / Deborah Severino6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2025-03-02vs SYR: Get a GripLost 12
L#1 DoublesCarolyn Greenwald / Sophie Wei vs Molly Ryan / Lizzie Barlow4-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesMadi Maley / Aija Leiponen vs Heidi Howard / Emily Qiu2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKelsey Pierce / Halli Sparks vs Valerie Clarke / Andrea Elliott3-6, 2-6
2025-02-23vs GoldbergLost 12
W#1 DoublesAija Leiponen / Madi Maley vs Katie Thomas / Johanna Ledley6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesEmily Madan / Jenny Barnett vs Sarah Elliott / Stephanie Thompson7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKyoungsoo Lee / Kelsey Pierce vs Allyson Mead / Nikki Howard3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-02-02vs SYR: Get a GripSplit 11
W#2 DoublesMadi Maley / Ashley Paolangeli vs Donna Hack / Kara Krueger6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSusan Cole / Kyoungsoo Lee vs Valerie Clarke / Rajani Day4-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 4.0,3.5,3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SYR: Get a Grip7220720216
2Goldberg54131436274
3The Racket Horror Picture Show45151230262

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Carolyn Greenwald
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Kuniko Okada
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.71
Vivian Zayas
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.58
Emily Madan
usually #2 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.48
Madi Maley
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.47
Aija Leiponen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.42
Ashley Paolangeli
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Amy Kohut
published 3.5
3.11
Kyoungsoo Lee
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.84
Halli Sparks
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.83
Jenna Holmes
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.72
Kelsey Pierce
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jenny Barnett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Cole
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Aija Leiponen + Ashley Paolangeli5065% games+11.9% vs expected
Vivian Zayas + Kuniko Okada5357% games+4.1% vs expected
Aija Leiponen + Madi Maley3252% games+2.1% vs expected
Aija Leiponen + Emily Madan314 matchesnot enough data
Emily Madan + Madi Maley404 matchesnot enough data
Carolyn Greenwald + Kuniko Okada213 matchesnot enough data
Emily Madan + Ashley Paolangeli303 matchesnot enough data
Halli Sparks + Kelsey Pierce123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Carolyn Greenwald
44W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.82
Kuniko Okada
35W–24L career · 9 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.75
Vivian Zayas
59W–15L career · 5 lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.71
3.5
Emily Madan
132W–60L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.58
Madi Maley
39W–15L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Aija Leiponen
73W–61L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Ashley Paolangeli
58W–22L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Amy Kohut
32W–28L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%<1%
3.15
Kyoungsoo Lee
24W–46L career · 4 lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
3.11
3
Halli Sparks
21W–28L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%88%11%
2.84
Jenna Holmes
19W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
2.83
Kelsey Pierce
8W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.72
Jenny Barnett
66W–41L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Cole
46W–42L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.