Teams

Harbour Point/Pinkerton/40+ Tri-Level

NEGTA Southern Tri-Level 40 & over - Spring · Women 3.0, 3.5, 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.38 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 3.0, 3.5, 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Trina Ball
published
3.50
Viv Davis
published
3.17
Patsy Greer
published
3.16
Alice Beach
published 3.5
3.15
Cheryl Dorfeld
published 3.5
3.10
Elcira Pinkerton
published 3.5
3.06
Gloria Parr
published 3
3.04
Patty Bettencourt
published
2.99
Mary Bell
published
2.73
Tracy Cavaness
published
Lauren Tyson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alice Beach + Patsy Greer8259% games+4.0% vs expected
Gloria Parr + Patsy Greer332153% games−0.9% vs expected
Patty Bettencourt + Elcira Pinkerton213 matchesnot enough data
Patty Bettencourt + Patsy Greer303 matchesnot enough data
Alice Beach + Cheryl Dorfeld213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Trina Ball
27W–20L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.63
Viv Davis
21W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%50%50%
3.50
Patsy Greer
123W–69L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Alice Beach
20W–30L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Cheryl Dorfeld
8W–13L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Elcira Pinkerton
24W–40L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.10
3
Gloria Parr
115W–55L career · no lines in 2022
<1%33%67%
3.06
Patty Bettencourt
55W–24L career · no lines in 2022
<1%39%61%
3.04
Mary Bell
2W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%54%46%
2.99
Tracy Cavaness
6W–10L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
Lauren Tyson
0W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.