Teams

Refunds

2024 Adult 18 & Over League · Refunds

21 players · average NTRP 3.59 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Refunds have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Baker Jordan
published 4.5
3.87
Randall Miller
published
3.84
Mark Griffey
published 4
3.80
Kevin Miller
published
3.73
Robert Major
published
3.72
Joseph Clarke
published
3.66
Martin Iles
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.58
Jennifer Haahs
published 4
3.55
Patrick Murchison
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.52
Tiger Zhang
published
3.50
Peter Sofarelli
published 3.5
3.47
Brandon Lucio
published 3.5
3.37
Rahul Ramkumar
published
3.35
Katie Brigulio
published 3.5
Dawn VanHoy
published 3.5
3.14
Vanessa Lowery
published
2.77
Jessica Fink
published
2.45
Donna Pollack
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.17
Melanie Bradle
published 2.5
Jacob Huffaker
published
Steven Eagan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patrick Murchison + Martin Iles4357% gamesnot enough data
Mark Griffey + Patrick Murchison4156% gamesnot enough data
Mark Griffey + Martin Iles2343% gamesnot enough data
Baker Jordan + Patrick Murchison123 matchesnot enough data
Martin Iles + Peter Sofarelli213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Baker Jordan
1W–6L career · no lines in 2024
83%17%<1%
3.87
Randall Miller
0W–7L career · no lines in 2024
83%17%<1%
3.87
4
Mark Griffey
59W–48L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%13%
3.84
Kevin Miller
7W–8L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.80
Robert Major
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
97%3%<1%
3.73
Joseph Clarke
7W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%5%95%
3.72
4
Martin Iles
161W–102L career · 6 lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.66
4
Jennifer Haahs
36W–34L career · no lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
3.58
4
Patrick Murchison
55W–48L career · 7 lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
3.55
Tiger Zhang
9W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%45%55%
3.52
3.5
Peter Sofarelli
86W–48L career · no lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
3.50
3.5
Brandon Lucio
19W–18L career · no lines in 2024
<1%58%42%
3.47
Rahul Ramkumar
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
3.37
3.5
Katie Brigulio
19W–16L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Dawn VanHoy
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Vanessa Lowery
12W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%16%84%
3.14
Jessica Fink
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.77
2.5
Donna Pollack
21W–38L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%64%36%
2.45
2.5
Melanie Bradle
7W–20L career · type S · no lines in 2024
0%99%1%
2.17
Jacob Huffaker
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Steven Eagan
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.