Teams

Cornelius 3.5

2025 Montgomery Doubles Summer Women · Montgomery Doubles Summer 3.5 Women

17 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-07-29vs Pugh - Norbeck SunsettersWon 21
L#1 DoublesMargaret Cornelius / Serena Kelly vs Nancy Hull / Carey Buffington2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Nicholson / Emma Wells vs Lucy Sullivan / Kiera Johnson6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTara Cooksey / Paula Pels vs Tiffany Laeng / Jaimie McDowell6-3, 6-3
2025-07-07vs Burns - Congo 3.5 CongressionalLost 02
L#1 DoublesMargaret Cornelius / Megan Rappolt vs Rachel Burns / Tracie Rolle3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesStevi Calandra / Lemin Xiao vs Nina Price / Christy Sporidis0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Doubles Summer 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Jamie Ekern
published
3.28
Leanne Bortner
published
3.25
Serena Kelly
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Regina Bodi
published
3.09
3.08
Emma Wells
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.02
Megan Rappolt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Elizabeth Nicholson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.95
Paula Pels
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.82
Corrina McGlone
published 3
2.80
Margaret Cornelius
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
2.73
Jennifer Donaghue
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.69
Sanam Boroumand
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.52
Lemin Xiao
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Michelle Grossman
published
Stevi Calandra
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Tara Cooksey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tara Cooksey + Michelle Grossman404 matchesnot enough data
Regina Bodi + Leanne Bortner213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jamie Ekern
4W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
Leanne Bortner
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Serena Kelly
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
3%93%4%
3.25
Regina Bodi
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.14
3
Daniella Casseres
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.09
Emma Wells
5W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%29%71%
3.08
Megan Rappolt
10W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.02
Elizabeth Nicholson
2W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.98
Paula Pels
5W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
65%35%<1%
2.95
3
Corrina McGlone
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
Margaret Cornelius
14W–20L career · 7 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.80
Jennifer Donaghue
7W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Sanam Boroumand
7W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
Lemin Xiao
16W–28L career · 5 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
2.52
Michelle Grossman
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Stevi Calandra
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Tara Cooksey
7W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.