Teams

WH Ballines SSL A18-4.0M

2025 WMI SSL USTA League Adult 18&Over Weekend Leagues · WMI SSL A18&O 4.0 M (8 player)

19 players · average NTRP 4.00 / WESTERN MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-05-03vs PTC Bont SSL A18-4.0MWon 41
L#1 DoublesSean Lindsay / Thomas Kling vs Zachary Rabitoy / Trent Pontious1-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesJohn Hertel vs Nathan Kunnen7-5, 7-6
W#2 DoublesCharles Krug / Daniel TerHaar vs Aj Clark / Patrick Williams6-4, 6-2
W#2 SinglesJon Hasper vs Joel Johnson6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDre Ballines / Bill Wisser vs Mark Elders / Kris Ransberger4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-04-05vs MSU Cuyar SSL A18-4.0MWon 40
W#1 DoublesSamuel Shnowske / Greg Watts vs Matthew Kempf / Austin Nevitt6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJohn Hertel vs Raju Pusapati6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCharles Krug / Daniel TerHaar vs Christopher Cuyar / Sergey Ilyashov7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJon Hasper / Nicolas Millet vs John Nelligan / Zachary Nachazel6-4, 6-0
2025-03-29vs PTC Tjalsma SSL A18-4.0MWon 41
L#1 DoublesAleksander Palczynski / Brendan Clune vs Koby Gossett / Christopher Stevens5-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesJohn Hertel vs Stephen Witte6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSamuel Shnowske / Long Vu vs Justin Rausch / Kirk Gossett4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesJon Hasper vs Daniel Bragg6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDre Ballines / Carl Doerschler vs Casey Tjalsma / Ryan Peters6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WMI SSL A18&O 4.0 M (8 player) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.80 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.15
John Hertel
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
4.09
Jon Hasper
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.93
Daniel TerHaar
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.86
Greg Watts
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.84
Bill Wisser
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.83
Samuel Shnowske
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
3.80
Jeremy Nufer
published
3.80
Dre Ballines
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.75
Nicolas Millet
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Brendan Clune
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Carl Doerschler
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.73
Charles Krug
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Aleksander Palczynski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.61
Sean Lindsay
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.41
Tyler Costello
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Jordan Nelson
published
Lin Bao
published
Long Vu
published
Thomas Kling
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Charles Krug + Daniel TerHaar4359% games+2.9% vs expected
Charles Krug + Nicolas Millet4650% games+1.0% vs expected
Bill Wisser + Samuel Shnowske7649% games+0.6% vs expected
Bill Wisser + Charles Krug5354% gamesnot enough data
Charles Krug + Dre Ballines3256% gamesnot enough data
Bill Wisser + Sean Lindsay314 matchesnot enough data
Greg Watts + Dre Ballines404 matchesnot enough data
Jon Hasper + Dre Ballines404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John Hertel
33W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%12%88%
4.15
Jon Hasper
50W–10L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%24%76%
4.09
4
Daniel TerHaar
20W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.93
4
Greg Watts
37W–22L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
<1%86%13%
3.86
4
Bill Wisser
73W–44L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%89%11%
3.84
Samuel Shnowske
32W–23L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.83
Jeremy Nufer
35W–35L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Dre Ballines
104W–49L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.80
Nicolas Millet
46W–35L career · 1 line in 2025
2%95%3%
3.75
4
Brendan Clune
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
4
Carl Doerschler
6W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Charles Krug
58W–36L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Aleksander Palczynski
3W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
13%87%<1%
3.65
Sean Lindsay
32W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.61
Tyler Costello
6W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.41
Jordan Nelson
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lin Bao
29W–32L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Long Vu
33W–13L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Thomas Kling
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.