Teams

Justice/Memphis

2026 Adult 18 & Over Early Start League - Memphis · 2.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 2.75 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-11-15vs Scott/MemphisWon 21
W#1 DoublesRachel Young / Caroline Martin vs Mary Schlais / Alexandria Powers6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesCaroline Schaefer vs Amber Varner6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLaura Justice / Kelly Presley vs Roni Terry / Madeline Wilson4-6, 0-6
2025-11-08vs Thornton/MemphisLost 12
W#1 DoublesCaroline Schaefer / Caroline Martin vs Kelsie Ellison / Ashanti Holder6-0, 6-3
L#1 SinglesSusannah Mays vs Ashley Bush1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMeredith Brasfield / Lisa Berryhill vs Destiny Taylor / Morgan Thornton3-6, 4-6
2025-11-01vs Davis/MemphisLost 12
W#1 DoublesKelly Presley / Rachel Young vs Cheryl Price / Jessie Williams6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesSusannah Mays vs Danielle Brewer3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAnna Embry / Neely Mcdurmon vs Amy Bull / Ellie Gibbs2-6, 0-6
2025-10-29vs Lewis/MemphisWon 21
W#1 DoublesCaroline Martin / Kelly Presley vs Susan Reyna / Ashley Walker6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesCaroline Schaefer vs Jacqueline Smith6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesNeely Mcdurmon / Anna Embry vs Tina David / Deanne Helvering3-6, 1-6
2025-10-18vs Wright/MemphisWon 30
W#1 DoublesKelly Presley / Rachel Young vs Tracy Lombardo / Jenni Harris6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesSusannah Mays vs Estelle Mitchell6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLisa Berryhill / Laura Justice vs Katherine Dorsett / Alicia Wright4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-10-08vs Wright/MemphisWon 21
W#1 DoublesCaroline Schaefer / Rachel Young vs Cristina Guibao / Estelle Mitchell6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesCaroline Martin vs Julie Upchurch6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMeredith Brasfield / Rachel Veteto vs Amber Sand / Parker Pippen3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-10-04vs Lewis/MemphisWon 20
W#1 SinglesCaroline Schaefer vs Julie Lewis6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMeredith Brasfield / Rachel Veteto vs Tina David / Deanne Helvering0-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-09-27vs Ray/MemphisWon 30
W#1 DoublesCaroline Martin / Jade Moss vs Amber Pettis / Allison Fowler6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesCaroline Schaefer vs Lexi Dickerson6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLisa Berryhill / Laura Justice vs Xeneia Sorrell / Shilpa Narina6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings13 teams · 2.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1McDermott/Memphis7118614136
2Rohlinger/Memphis6219510134
3Justice/Memphis6216819157
4Greer/Memphis5317717190
5Thornton/Memphis53131124202
6Davis/Memphis44121224191
7Wright/Memphis44121227217
8Witte/Memphis44111328197
9Flynt/Memphis26101431228
10McLaughlin/Memphis2691532231
11SLewis/Memphis2681633239
12Steffner/Memphis2691533240
13Magness/Memphis0812347291

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.27 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.90
Caroline Schaefer
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.67
Caroline Martin
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.52
Kelly Presley
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.50
Susannah Mays
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
2.37
Laura Justice
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.26
Jade Moss
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.06
Rachel Veteto
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.04
Meredith Brasfield
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.00
Lisa Berryhill
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
1.86
Neely Mcdurmon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
1.82
Anna Embry
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Caroline Martin + Caroline Schaefer6162% games+15.8% vs expected
Meredith Brasfield + Lisa Berryhill1535% games+3.8% vs expected
Jade Moss + Caroline Martin4352% games+2.2% vs expected
Neely Mcdurmon + Anna Embry0626% games−14.8% vs expected
Meredith Brasfield + Rachel Veteto2340% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Berryhill + Laura Justice3248% gamesnot enough data
Caroline Schaefer + Kelly Presley314 matchesnot enough data
Rachel Veteto + Laura Justice123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Caroline Schaefer
28W–9L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Caroline Martin
21W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
10%90%1%
2.67
Kelly Presley
13W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%42%58%
2.52
Susannah Mays
24W–16L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%52%48%
2.50
Laura Justice
7W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%83%17%
2.37
2.5
Jade Moss
8W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
0%97%3%
2.26
Rachel Veteto
7W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.06
Meredith Brasfield
6W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.04
Lisa Berryhill
5W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.00
Neely Mcdurmon
0W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.86
2.5
Anna Embry
0W–9L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.82

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.