Teams

GEPTA/Baeza/40&over/3.5W

SouthernNewMexico · 2024 USA ADULT 40 & OVER LEAGUE

16 players · average NTRP 3.17 / GEPTA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2024 USA ADULT 40 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23
Claire Brandon
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.16
Elizabeth Wakefield
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 24% · published
2.71
Alison Krattiger
usually #1 Doubles 41%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 3
2.69
Claudia Dominguez
usually #2 Doubles 45%, also #1 Doubles 35% · published 3
Ellen Michnovicz
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
Emily Adamczyk
usually #1 Singles 62%, also #2 Singles 31% · published
Gerla Gallardo
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
Gerrianne Lockhart-Walker
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published
Guadalupe Castillo
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published
Jamie Borsodi
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
Maggie Follin
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Margaret Baeza
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Martha Trost
usually #2 Doubles 54%, also #1 Doubles 39% · published
Sarahi Najera
usually #1 Singles 39%, also #2 Singles 31% · published
Ursula Morawietz
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
Yazmin Pineda
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 32% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Guadalupe Castillo + Ursula Morawietz14957% gamesnot enough data
Gerla Gallardo + Guadalupe Castillo12656% gamesnot enough data
Gerla Gallardo + Ursula Morawietz7356% gamesnot enough data
Gerrianne Lockhart-Walker + Alison Krattiger2644% gamesnot enough data
Maggie Follin + Martha Trost4349% gamesnot enough data
Gerrianne Lockhart-Walker + Margaret Baeza3451% gamesnot enough data
Claudia Dominguez + Alison Krattiger3446% gamesnot enough data
Guadalupe Castillo + Sarahi Najera2445% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Claire Brandon
36W–46L career · 12 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
Elizabeth Wakefield
37W–14L career · 17 lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.16
3
Alison Krattiger
30W–54L career · 20 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
2.71
3
Claudia Dominguez
61W–64L career · 20 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
2.69
Ellen Michnovicz
44W–69L career · 10 lines in 2024
not enough data
Emily Adamczyk
9W–4L career · 13 lines in 2024
not enough data
Gerla Gallardo
96W–62L career · 23 lines in 2024
not enough data
Gerrianne Lockhart-Walker
61W–87L career · 18 lines in 2024
not enough data
Guadalupe Castillo
96W–65L career · 23 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jamie Borsodi
22W–37L career · 8 lines in 2024
not enough data
Maggie Follin
42W–32L career · 9 lines in 2024
not enough data
Margaret Baeza
23W–26L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Martha Trost
19W–31L career · 13 lines in 2024
not enough data
Sarahi Najera
69W–38L career · 13 lines in 2024
not enough data
Ursula Morawietz
40W–27L career · 14 lines in 2024
not enough data
Yazmin Pineda
42W–37L career · 27 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.