Teams

Tonks/ymca/foothills

2023 Foothills Combo Doubles - 40 & over · 7.5 Combo Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.94 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-10-16vs Erikson/HCP/FoothillsWon 10
W#1 DoublesKaren Tonks / Ellen Stupka vs Tracy Kiefer / Kelly Miller6-2, 6-0
2023-10-09vs Diamonti/LHCC/FoothillsLost 01
L#2 DoublesKaren Tonks / Ellen Stupka vs Marsha Diamonti / Sunday Richardson4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2023-09-25vs Kim/RBCC/FoothillsWon 10
W#2 DoublesKaren Tonks / Ellen Stupka vs Tamara Woods / Nina Scopes6-1, 6-0
2023-09-21vs Diamonti/LHCC/FoothillsLost 01
L#3 DoublesKaren Tonks / Ellen Stupka vs Rosemary Skoog / Kirsten Morin4-6, 4-6
2023-09-18vs Lewis/DV/FoothillsWon 10
W#2 DoublesKaren Tonks / Ellen Stupka vs Ruth Smith / Kathleen Ryan6-2, 6-1
2023-09-11vs Erikson/HCP/FoothillsWon 10
W#1 DoublesKaren Tonks / Cori Thompson vs Lynne Place / Kelly Miller4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-08-21vs Kim/RBCC/FoothillsWon 10
W#2 DoublesKaren Tonks / Ellen Stupka vs Tamara Woods / Nina Scopes6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Combo Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.14
Irma Laney
published 4.5
3.77
Karen Tonks
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.73
Ellen Stupka
published 4
3.68
Candace Scott
published 4
3.66
3.56
Kelli Schmidt
published
3.43
Dawn Owens
published 4
3.29
Elise Wright
published 3.5
3.09
Cori Thompson
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ellen Stupka + Karen Tonks4452% games−5.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Irma Laney
42W–20L career · no lines in 2023
14%86%<1%
4.14
4
Karen Tonks
123W–132L career · 7 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Ellen Stupka
73W–37L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Candace Scott
8W–4L career · no lines in 2023
9%91%1%
3.68
4
Charlotte Hartman
10W–13L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%<1%
3.66
Kelli Schmidt
9W–11L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
3.56
4
Dawn Owens
3W–18L career · no lines in 2023
70%30%<1%
3.43
3.5
Elise Wright
14W–6L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
Cori Thompson
1W–7L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.09

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.