Teams

3.0 women

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 USA ADULT 40 & OVER LEAGUE

4 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Flight standings1 teams · 2026 USA ADULT 40 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
13.0 women000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.82
Celia Al-Tahan
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 3
Keithley Stanley
usually #1 Singles 27%, also #2 Singles 27% · published
Lorena Sosa
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 24% · published
Lourdes Olivas
usually #1 Doubles 48%, also #2 Doubles 48% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lourdes Olivas + Celia Al-Tahan273547% games+5.4% vs expected
Lourdes Olivas + Lorena Sosa3539% gamesnot enough data
Lorena Sosa + Celia Al-Tahan213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Celia Al-Tahan
119W–164L career · 33 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
2.82
Keithley Stanley
49W–28L career · 21 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lorena Sosa
64W–114L career · 21 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lourdes Olivas
98W–118L career · 29 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.