Teams

2022 Tri Level Men's 18- Reinaldo Corrra

2022 Tri Level 18 & Over · 2022 Tri Level Mens 18

8 players · average NTRP 4.21 / PUERTO RICO

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
W#1 DoublesAlberto Carrero / Reinaldo Correa vs Alvaro Racines / Carlos Rivera-Gallardo6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesHector Davila / Antonio Pagan vs Jorge Marfisi / Victor Santiago6-4, 6-3
2022-12-04vs 2022 Tri Level Men's 18- ZorrillaSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAlberto Carrero / Reinaldo Correa vs Humberto Vergara / Daniel Nazario6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLucas Quiroga / Angel Torres vs Eduardo Cortes / Diego Rodriguez3-6, 1-6
2022-12-03vs 2022 Tri Level Men's 18- LydiaWon 30
W#1 DoublesReinaldo Correa / Alberto Carrero vs Jose Cartagena / Melvin Arroyo6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLucas Quiroga / Joaquin Quinoy vs Carlos Perez-Castellano / Manuel Bermudez6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDiego Nazario / Antonio Pagan vs Rafael Pena / Miguel Moreno6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2022 Tri Level Mens 18 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.89 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.42
Alberto Carrero
published 4.5
Eugenio Torres
published 4.5
4.15
Reinaldo Correa
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Diego Nazario
published 4
Hector Davila
published 4
3.67
Joaquin Quinoy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Lucas Quiroga
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Antonio Pagan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alberto Carrero + Reinaldo Correa5167% games+10.9% vs expected
Joaquin Quinoy + Lucas Quiroga311557% games+4.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Alberto Carrero
28W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%72%28%
4.42
4.5
Eugenio Torres
6W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Reinaldo Correa
108W–45L career · 3 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
4.15
4
Diego Nazario
10W–18L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Hector Davila
7W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Joaquin Quinoy
107W–48L career · 1 line in 2022
10%90%1%
3.67
Lucas Quiroga
67W–49L career · 2 lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.63
4
Antonio Pagan
192W–100L career · 2 lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.58

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.