Teams

NIN FW 18&O 4.0 M: WW Rosales

NIN FW Adult 18 & Over · NIN FW 18 & Over 4.0 Men

4 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHERN INDIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-21vs NIN FW 18&O 4.0 M: WW White/LoeraSplit 11
W#2 DoublesScott Abshagen / Craig Owens vs Cosimo Lombardi / Gregory Ping6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAbner Mendador / Chuyen Le vs Josh Quandt / Michael Marietta6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-07-17vs NIN FW 18&O 4.0 M: WW SatherLost 12
W#1 DoublesChuyen Le / Thiago Amaral vs Shashank Kashyap / Shantanu Kulkarni6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCharles Vu / Rabon Forrest vs Scott Lunsford / Tim Stauffer3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAdam Basinger / Jerome Rosales vs Cameron Cook / Jay Stanchin2-6, 1-6
2026-07-07Lost 01
L#3 DoublesCharles Vu / Jerome Rosales vs Jon Adams / Gregory Ping1-6, 1-6
2026-06-30vs NIN FW 18&O 4.0 M: WW SatherLost 02
L#2 DoublesThiago Amaral / Scott Abshagen vs Derek French / Abdali Jan6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesChuyen Le / Adam Basinger vs Cameron Cook / Giri Anand4-6, 1-6
2026-06-16vs NIN FW 18&O 4.0 M: WW White/LoeraLost 02
L#2 DoublesScott Abshagen / Abner Mendador vs Charles Rollins / Tim Koehl3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRabon Forrest / Jerome Rosales vs Steve White / Taylor Zank4-6, 3-6
2026-06-02vs NIN FW 18&O 4.0 M: WW White/LoeraLost 01
L#1 DoublesCharles Vu / Craig Owens vs Tim Koehl / Brandon Amstutz5-7, 3-6
2026-05-26vs NIN FW 18&O 4.0 M: WW SatherLost 02
L#1 DoublesScott Abshagen / Ben Smith vs Brayden LaPan / Abdali Jan5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesChuyen Le / Jerome Rosales vs Arfak UdDowla / Jonathan Lee6-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · NIN FW 18 & Over 4.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NIN FW 18&O 4.0 M: WW Sather71261436361
2NIN FW 18&O 4.0 M: WW White/Loera44231738353
3NIN FW 18&O 4.0 M: WW Rosales17112960429

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Chuyen Le
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.25
Charles Vu
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.24
Scott Abshagen
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.16
Jerome Rosales
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jerome Rosales + Charles Vu4250% gamesnot enough data
Scott Abshagen + Chuyen Le123 matchesnot enough data
Jerome Rosales + Chuyen Le033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Chuyen Le
130W–66L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.33
3.5
Charles Vu
42W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
Scott Abshagen
70W–83L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%4%96%
3.24
Jerome Rosales
98W–103L career · 8 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.16

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.