Teams

SFT:Spark:Sideman

2025 EMA Adult 55 & Over Women · 7.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.67 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-08-11vs BRTC:Bass River:Connors/CicconeWon 30
W#1 DoublesMary D'Aoust / Carolyn Woods-Conklin vs Jane Heil / Jeanette Bybee4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPatty Barry / Kelly O'Connor vs Bonnie Dean / Tracey Smith7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesPatricia Ehlbeck / Debora Lunt vs Laura Knearem / Nancy Coletti6-1, 6-1
2025-08-04vs Causing A Racquet:Platania/BishopWon 30
W#1 DoublesJolene Buttress / Julie Petros vs Wendy Bacheller / Jody Lannan2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMary D'Aoust / Carolyn Woods-Conklin vs Bridget MacMillan / Christina Sollecito6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesPatricia Ehlbeck / Debora Lunt vs Dena Dehullu / Kathleen Smith6-3, 6-3
2025-07-21vs BRTC:Bass River:Connors/CicconeWon 21
L#1 DoublesMary Kijanka / Katherine Gendron vs Tracey Smith / Una Nimhurchu-Dennehy0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCarolyn Woods-Conklin / Lynnell Schiela vs Marjorie Robb / Catherine Felton6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJulie Petros / Jolene Buttress vs Jeanette Bybee / Jane Heil6-4, 6-1
2025-06-30vs Causing A Racquet:Platania/BishopLost 12
L#1 DoublesKatherine Gendron / Mary Kijanka vs Wendy Bacheller / Jody Lannan2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMary D'Aoust / Jolene Buttress vs Dena Dehullu / Kathleen Smith3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCarolyn Woods-Conklin / Debora Lunt vs Paula Bishop / Sandra Reiniger4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-06-02vs BRTC:Bass River:Connors/CicconeLost 02
L#1 DoublesCarolyn Woods-Conklin / Julie Petros vs Debbie Phillips / Marjorie Robb1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJanet Smith / Debora Lunt vs Jeanette Bybee / Jane Heil7-6, 2-4, 1-0
2025-05-19vs Causing A Racquet:Platania/BishopLost 12
W#1 DoublesPatty Barry / Lynnell Schiela vs Dena Dehullu / Kathleen Smith6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJulie Petros / Carolyn Woods-Conklin vs Jody Lannan / Christina Sollecito3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesPatricia Ehlbeck / Debora Lunt vs Kathleen Foley / Jill Romano5-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.46
Evan Sideman
published 4.5
3.83
Patricia Ehlbeck
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published
3.48
Patty Barry
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.38
Julie Petros
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.36
Kelly O'Connor
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Mary D'Aoust
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Carolyn Woods-Conklin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Jolene Buttress
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.19
Lynnell Schiela
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.12
Janet Smith
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Debora Lunt
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
Katherine Gendron
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Mary Kijanka
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary D'Aoust + Carolyn Woods-Conklin262952% games+0.2% vs expected
Julie Petros + Lynnell Schiela9852% games−3.8% vs expected
Mary Kijanka + Katherine Gendron10853% gamesnot enough data
Julie Petros + Mary D'Aoust3260% gamesnot enough data
Mary D'Aoust + Jolene Buttress4157% gamesnot enough data
Julie Petros + Jolene Buttress314 matchesnot enough data
Kelly O'Connor + Mary D'Aoust404 matchesnot enough data
Lynnell Schiela + Jolene Buttress134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Evan Sideman
75W–34L career · no lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
4.46
Patricia Ehlbeck
81W–50L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.83
Patty Barry
135W–69L career · 2 lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
3.48
Julie Petros
34W–33L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.38
Kelly O'Connor
88W–46L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.36
Mary D'Aoust
115W–80L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%86%13%
3.35
3.5
Carolyn Woods-Conklin
33W–38L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jolene Buttress
51W–48L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.24
Lynnell Schiela
109W–54L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
Janet Smith
8W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.12
3
Debora Lunt
28W–46L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.78
Katherine Gendron
17W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Kijanka
57W–60L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.