Teams

STSC-W1dubs

2022 One Doubles · 3.5 Women

4 players · average NTRP 3.67 / SOUTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-08-07vs STSC-HudsonWon 10
W#1 DoublesTrisha Rutherford / Karen Smith vs Maggie Hudson / Nancy Bashey7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2022-08-06vs ACB-ColeLost 01
L#1 DoublesTrisha Rutherford / Karen Smith vs Lisa Johannessen / Helen Silfven4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2022-08-06vs ESTC-RansomLost 01
L#1 DoublesKathy Stahl / Marianne Bradshaw vs Charlotte Ransom / Bobbi Kearney4-6, 5-7
2022-08-05vs STSC-BomanLost 01
L#1 DoublesKathy Stahl / Marianne Bradshaw vs Katherine Horn / Jill Ainsworth0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1ESTC-Ransom3131230
2STSC-Boman3131330
3STSC-Hudson1313641
4STSC-W1dubs1313746
5EYMCA-Gibbs000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Karen Smith
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.44
Marianne Bradshaw
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Trisha Rutherford
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.99
Kathy Stahl
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Smith + Kathy Stahl314 matchesnot enough data
Kathy Stahl + Marianne Bradshaw044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Karen Smith
44W–30L career · 2 lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.63
Marianne Bradshaw
19W–21L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%67%32%
3.44
3.5
Trisha Rutherford
17W–21L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Kathy Stahl
69W–81L career · 2 lines in 2022
52%48%<1%
2.99

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.