← Teams

The Dark Side

2019 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Women

2 players · average NTRP 4 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Angela Keck
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.22
Michelle O'Neil
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 4
Results6 ties
2019-01-05Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesReva Wallace / Michelle O'Neil vs Dana Landry / Michelle Jordan6-4, 7-5
2018-12-02Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesMichelle O'Neil / Angela Keck vs Karin Brown / Penny Woodruff7-6, 6-3
2018-11-18Lost 0–2
L#2 DoublesAngela Keck / Karen Schrank vs Karin Gruver / Cynthia Kadoshima7-6, 6-2
L#2 SinglesMichelle O'Neil vs Margaret Elofson7-5, 0-6, 1-0
2018-11-04Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesMichelle O'Neil / Tanya Bond vs Anneke Berry / Misa Banks6-7, 7-5, 1-0
2018-10-21Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesMary Guptill / Michelle O'Neil vs Candace Hines / Deanna Latendresse6-0, 6-3
2018-09-23Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesReva Wallace / Michelle O'Neil vs Tenley Cederstrand / Jill Peters6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesAngela Keck / Karen Schrank vs Cynthia Kadoshima / Kathleen Smoots4-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Angela Keck
80W–104L career
0%99%0%
3.76
4
Michelle O'Neil
69W–73L career
95%5%0%
3.22

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.