Teams

HOCO-BENDALL

2026 MATA USTA Southern Combo 40 & Over - Summer · 8.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-24vs HOCO-HornsbyLost 02
L#1 DoublesBeth Cohen / Carol Karlson vs DeAsiah Johnson / Nozipho Lewis4-8
L#2 DoublesStacy Byrd / Julie Redick vs Jennifer Hornsby / Lisa Wilcox5-8
2026-08-23vs HOCO-HornsbyLost 02
L#1 DoublesStacy Byrd / Joanna Roller vs Tangela Sanders / Lucille Watkins2-8
L#2 DoublesJulie Reynolds / Patsy Bendall vs Sarah Hankamer / Sarah Witherspoon3-8
2026-08-09vs HOCO-HornsbyLost 02
L#1 DoublesPatsy Bendall / Kristi Warren vs Jennifer Hornsby / Sarah Witherspoon0-8
L#2 DoublesBeth Cohen / Carol Karlson vs Rhonda Harris / Lisa Wilcox2-8
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 8.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1HOCO-BENDALL000000
2HOCO-Hornsby000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Beth Cohen
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.75
Patsy Bendall
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
3.71
Carol Karlson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.69
Joanna Roller
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.62
Stacy Byrd
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.56
Traci Ludicke
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
3.50
Julie Redick
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.44
Julie Reynolds
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patsy Bendall + Julie Reynolds41245% games−1.8% vs expected
Joanna Roller + Julie Redick224 matchesnot enough data
Carol Karlson + Beth Cohen224 matchesnot enough data
Patsy Bendall + Traci Ludicke213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Beth Cohen
19W–17L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.77
Patsy Bendall
39W–50L career · 8 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Carol Karlson
9W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.71
Joanna Roller
26W–39L career · 7 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.69
Stacy Byrd
66W–38L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%18%82%
3.62
Traci Ludicke
75W–63L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%32%68%
3.56
Julie Redick
23W–31L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.50
Julie Reynolds
25W–41L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
3.44

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.