Teams

MD.Bostrom

2025 CTRL Tri-Level 18 & Over · Tri-Level 18 4.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.20 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-22vs LOCH.TerjesenLost 01
L#3 DoublesDeanna Hart / Katie Klingemann vs Heather Tuttle / Kristine Potter3-6
2025-07-15vs TOC.BarcinasLost 03
L#1 DoublesLindsay Winters / Cait Bauer vs Meghan Rider / Nancy Pack2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKatie Scroggins / Hillary Parnell vs Jennifer Lefebvre / Tanya Barcinas1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJaime Nolan / Rochelle Roth vs Sabrina Kane / Lauren Triebert1-6, 1-6
2025-07-08vs ACP.TandradinataLost 02
L#2 DoublesKatie Klingemann / Deanna Hart vs Aulia Tandradinata / Molly Andrews1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesRochelle Roth / Kelly Shields vs Debbie Castiller / Christina Pipkin0-6, 0-6
2025-06-24vs MD.LigayLost 02
L#1 DoublesPaige Jennings / Meredith Kinkle vs Allie Ligay / Christine Reinke6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLindsay Winters / Cait Bauer vs Casey Hale / Beth McKinley3-6, 4-6
2025-06-23vs TOC.ShuklaLost 02
L#2 DoublesHillary Parnell / Dabney Sninski vs Stephanie Charlino / Smita Shukla6-3, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRochelle Roth / Kelly Shields vs Jeannine McClung / Maureen Green6-7, 5-7
2025-06-17vs TING.NarayananWon 10
W#2 DoublesMeredith Heath / Dabney Sninski vs Stephanie Hanses / Disha Narayanan6-3, 6-2
2025-06-03vs ANP.PopeWon 20
W#1 DoublesCait Bauer / Paige Jennings vs Najia Cheema / Wilda Eade6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKatie Klingemann / Katie Scroggins vs Hyunjin Jung / Jennifer Leahy6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Tri-Level 18 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Cait Bauer
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.33
Lindsay Winters
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.28
Meredith Kinkle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Angie Bostrom
published 3.5
3.18
Jennifer Moses
published
3.13
Meredith Heath
published
3.01
Jaime Nolan
published 3
2.98
Hillary Parnell
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.95
Katie Klingemann
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.77
Dabney Sninski
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.46
Deanna Hart
published 3
2.36
Rochelle Roth
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Paige Jennings
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dabney Sninski + Rochelle Roth134 matchesnot enough data
Dabney Sninski + Hillary Parnell224 matchesnot enough data
Rochelle Roth + Deanna Hart044 matchesnot enough data
Meredith Heath + Hillary Parnell213 matchesnot enough data
Hillary Parnell + Katie Klingemann303 matchesnot enough data
Jaime Nolan + Katie Klingemann303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cait Bauer
88W–53L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.51
3.5
Lindsay Winters
84W–47L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Meredith Kinkle
63W–58L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Angie Bostrom
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
8%92%1%
3.19
Jennifer Moses
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.18
Meredith Heath
41W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%16%84%
3.13
3
Jaime Nolan
11W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.01
3
Hillary Parnell
105W–87L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
2.98
3
Katie Klingemann
97W–62L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
2.95
3
Dabney Sninski
86W–104L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Deanna Hart
4W–16L career · no lines in 2025
61%39%<1%
2.46
3
Rochelle Roth
63W–108L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
87%13%<1%
2.36
Paige Jennings
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.