Teams

Ry.Garrett40A

2024 Capital Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-05-15vs De.Farmer40A3.0MWon 10
W#1 SinglesDavid Coman vs Lawrence Pollard6-1, 6-0
2024-05-08vs Sh.Skillman40ALost 01
L#1 DoublesDavid Coman / Ronald Elliott vs Gary Fye / Travis Holshouser2-6, 3-6
2024-04-24vs Ri.Lowe40AWon 10
W#2 DoublesDavid Coman / Matthew Pare vs Kevin Roddy / Bruce Farrell6-2, 6-4
2024-04-17vs Jo.Allessio40AWon 10
W#3 DoublesDavid Coman / Timothy Franklin vs Paul Shimp / Sanjay Patel6-1, 6-1
2024-04-10vs De.Farmer40A3.0MWon 10
W#1 DoublesMatthew Pare / David Coman vs Patrick Faulkner / Elliott Blades6-0, 6-1
2024-04-03vs Sh.Skillman40ALost 01
L#1 DoublesDavid Coman / Ronald Elliott vs Gary Fye / Travis Holshouser5-7, 5-7
2024-03-25vs Jo.Allessio40AWon 10
W#2 DoublesDavid Coman / Jason Parrish vs John Allessio / James Kriete6-4, 6-1
2024-03-20Won 10
W#3 DoublesDavid Coman / Scott Lundy vs Billy Usrey / James Reardon6-0, 6-2
2024-03-13vs Ri.Lowe40AWon 10
W#3 DoublesDavid Coman / Ryan Garrett vs Mike Royal / Michael Caiola6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Casey Smith
published 3.5
3.29
Matthew Pare
published
3.17
Timothy Franklin
published
3.16
Scott Lundy
published
3.15
Lincoln Larson
published
3.11
David Coman
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.11
Ryan Garrett
published
2.99
Ronald Elliott
published
2.86
Ajay Keshava
published 3
2.82
Jason Parrish
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Coman + Matthew Pare3352% games+0.9% vs expected
Ronald Elliott + Scott Lundy123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Casey Smith
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%19%
3.39
Matthew Pare
10W–13L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.29
Timothy Franklin
24W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%9%91%
3.17
Scott Lundy
9W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%11%89%
3.16
Lincoln Larson
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%<1%
3.15
3
David Coman
87W–47L career · 15 lines in 2024
<1%20%80%
3.11
Ryan Garrett
12W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%21%79%
3.11
Ronald Elliott
21W–21L career · no lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
2.99
3
Ajay Keshava
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%85%15%
2.86
Jason Parrish
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%8%
2.82

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.