Teams

San Jose - Hennessy

2025 Duval Adult 55 & Over - Women Winter · 7.0 Adult 55 & Over Winter - Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.38 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-03-01vs Kraft - DoucetteWon 20
W#1 DoublesDawn Siebenhaar / Jessica Mills vs Kelly Doucette / Joyce Menz6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesKatharine Healey / Kathleen Lebet vs Melissa Brazill / Bonnie Rosebush6-4, 6-2
2025-02-01vs Kraft - DoucetteWon 21
W#1 DoublesBETSEY WINSLOW / Dawn Siebenhaar vs Beth Fuhrer / Kathy Wesche6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKristin Fernandez / Caroline Costa vs Kelly Doucette / Joyce Menz6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKathleen Lebet / Carmel Buchanan vs Melissa Brazill / Patricia Clifford6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Adult 55 & Over Winter - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Nancy Hennessy
published
3.42
Dawn Siebenhaar
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Janet Olinto
published
3.19
BETSEY WINSLOW
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Carmel Buchanan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.83
Cynthia Hodges
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.83
Laurie Kirchhoff
published
2.81
Phyllis Crabtree
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Katharine Healey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kathleen Lebet
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Kristin Fernandez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Phyllis Crabtree + Cynthia Hodges7951% games+1.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nancy Hennessy
14W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Dawn Siebenhaar
11W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.42
Janet Olinto
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
BETSEY WINSLOW
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Carmel Buchanan
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%<1%
3.16
3
Cynthia Hodges
16W–22L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.83
Laurie Kirchhoff
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.83
Phyllis Crabtree
18W–21L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
2.81
Katharine Healey
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kathleen Lebet
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kristin Fernandez
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.