Teams

SSH BLUE

2022 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 4.5 - 18 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 4.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-06-04vs SSH GREENLost 04
L#1 DoublesCindy McLemore / Adrienne Wilson vs Leslie Mease / Brittney Ricci6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesShiela Enser vs Michelle Miller0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesChristina Walker / Sarah Zodin vs Amy Hand / Deoni Levy4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKristina Brandner / Christianna Dancer vs Anja Mapstone / Susan Marshall0-6, 2-6
2022-05-24vs SSLT PINKWon 21
W#1 DoublesKate James / Paige Burke vs Peggy Seyfert / Midi Daddis6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesVictoria Rozelaar-Ferrell / Adrienne Wilson vs Kristen Padberg / Adriana Buonassisi6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesKristina Brandner / Christianna Dancer vs Jill Hanafee / Victoria Barstow4-6, 4-6
2022-05-17vs CACI SILVERWon 41
W#1 DoublesPaige Burke / Cindy McLemore vs Michelle Arend / Kim Ripka6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesShiela Enser vs Mikele Smith6-2, 0-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSarah Zodin / Adrienne Wilson vs Judy Kennelley / Shannon Hickey6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesVictoria Rozelaar-Ferrell vs Kristi Samuelson6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPam Turner / Christianna Dancer vs Tanya Harrington / Angel Spivak6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2022-05-10vs RRTC PURPLELost 12
W#1 DoublesPaige Burke / Kate James vs Amanda Iapalucci / Deborah Weis7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAudrey Davine / Sarah Zodin vs Julie Cramer / Stacie Chadwick3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesVictoria Rozelaar-Ferrell / Christianna Dancer vs Angela Seaberg / Courtney Krusemark1-6, 3-6
2022-05-03vs LTFC PURPLELost 13
L#1 DoublesAdrienne Wilson / Kristina Brandner vs Kelly Cohen / Carol Jochens4-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesShiela Enser vs Maggie Wilson0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesCindy McLemore / Audrey Davine vs Lori Benson / Katherine Hahn7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKate James / Victoria Rozelaar-Ferrell vs Maribeth Hanzlik / Jennifer Girard7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2022-04-26vs GAC BLACKLost 04
L#1 DoublesPaige Burke / Cindy McLemore vs Katie Deline / Julie Wilson2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesVictoria Rozelaar-Ferrell vs Chelsea Ye5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesPam Turner / Audrey Davine vs Mellissa Carle / Stacie Hochstadt3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSarah Zodin / Kate James vs Saryn Mooney / Stephanie McCauley4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings17 teams · WOMEN 4.5 - 18 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LEBTC GREEN6129618255
2LTA BLACK51181228249
3BTA NAVY51181229267
4SSH BLUE52231233281
5CACM YELLOW42181230253
6BVP GREEN42161431257
7CACI NAVY33131739285
8GPTC BLACK34161943340
9SKY GREEN34142146324
10SSH RED24141636258
11MEA PURPLE24121840288
12CVTA GREY24121841300
13MEA NAVY15121842299
14CR RED15102043278
15HRCA RED16142143312
16ATC BLUE16102552359
17DTC SILVER0682247326

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.37 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.50
Adrienne Wilson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.49
Paige Burke
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.44
Kristina Brandner
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.26
Victoria Rozelaar-Ferrell
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
Audrey Davine
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Cindy McLemore
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.16
Shiela Enser
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Christianna Dancer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kate James
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Sarah Zodin
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cindy McLemore + Paige Burke5163% games+13.1% vs expected
Paige Burke + Kate James5164% games+9.4% vs expected
Adrienne Wilson + Victoria Rozelaar-Ferrell6160% games+7.7% vs expected
Cindy McLemore + Adrienne Wilson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Adrienne Wilson
27W–12L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%51%49%
4.50
Paige Burke
32W–10L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%54%46%
4.49
4.5
Kristina Brandner
98W–37L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%67%33%
4.44
Victoria Rozelaar-Ferrell
16W–7L career · 5 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
4.26
4.5
Audrey Davine
18W–14L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Cindy McLemore
14W–19L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Shiela Enser
22W–16L career · 3 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
4.16
Christianna Dancer
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kate James
6W–4L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sarah Zodin
20W–6L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.