Teams

Orangeseminole/Monge/40&Over6.0Mxd

2024 ORANGESEMINOLE Mixed 40 & Over · 6.0 Mixed 40 & Over

12 players · average NTRP 3.17 / REGION_4

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-03-26vs USTA Campus-LuterWon 10
W#1 DoublesPatricia Colloca Massot / Richard Cooper vs Jose Rivera / Cindy Strange6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesYazmin Valentin / Richard Cooper vs Katherine Ozdemir / James Mead7-5, 6-0
2024-03-05vs USTA Campus-LuterWon 10
W#3 DoublesJoel Montes / Patricia Colloca Massot vs Sarah Luter / William Crellin6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesYazmin Valentin / Jorge Gutierrez vs Katherine Ozdemir / James Mead6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-02-13vs USTA Campus-LuterLost 01
L#2 DoublesJoel Montes / Yazmin Valentin vs Susannah Randolph / Scott Randolph2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJorge Gutierrez / Patricia Colloca Massot vs Elly Phoebus / Gary Singer7-5, 6-3
W#1 DoublesYazmin Valentin / Joel Montes vs Suzanne K Castillo / Jorge L Gomez6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Mixed 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Richard van Smith
published
3.34
Joseph Massot
published
3.29
Marites Tandoc
published
3.21
Jaqueline Pelliccia
published 3.5
3.13
Richard Cooper
published
3.09
Patricia Colloca Massot
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
3.05
Leticia Monge
published
2.89
Yazmin Valentin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Elliot Ortiz
published
Joel Montes
published
Lisa van Smith
published
Xinxin Liu
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patricia Colloca Massot + Joseph Massot224 matchesnot enough data
Richard van Smith + Lisa van Smith213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Richard van Smith
27W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
3.46
Joseph Massot
19W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%1%99%
3.34
Marites Tandoc
8W–2L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Jaqueline Pelliccia
67W–53L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
Richard Cooper
6W–21L career · no lines in 2024
18%81%<1%
3.13
3
Patricia Colloca Massot
101W–68L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%26%74%
3.09
Leticia Monge
4W–12L career · no lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
3.05
3
Yazmin Valentin
78W–61L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
2.89
Elliot Ortiz
9W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Joel Montes
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lisa van Smith
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Xinxin Liu
3W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.