Teams

MTH Smeal Super Spinners

2022 USTA League Adult 40 & Over - Fall 2021 Day League - HS · 4.0 Women Day League 40D1S3D M

14 players · average NTRP 4.17 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0 Women Day League 40D1S3D M have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Cindy Morgan
published 4.5
4.10
Sandra Wiles
published
3.94
Stephanie Steele
published
3.92
Shelley Porter
published
3.87
Jeritta Barnes
published
3.86
Ann Copeland
published 4
3.78
Linda Lindberg
published
Audra Hill
published 4
3.58
Peggy Richardson
published
3.52
Vicki Mello
published
3.38
Karen Norton
published
3.29
Susan Turner
published
3.19
Mary Smeal
published
Yvette Bolen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cindy Morgan + Shelley Porter13364% games+5.9% vs expected
Ann Copeland + Jeritta Barnes9460% games+4.1% vs expected
Karen Norton + Linda Lindberg5254% games−2.5% vs expected
Ann Copeland + Linda Lindberg5164% gamesnot enough data
Peggy Richardson + Vicki Mello3252% gamesnot enough data
Stephanie Steele + Jeritta Barnes213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Cindy Morgan
40W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%17%
4.38
Sandra Wiles
20W–24L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
4.10
Stephanie Steele
147W–40L career · no lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
3.94
Shelley Porter
18W–16L career · no lines in 2022
73%27%<1%
3.92
Jeritta Barnes
67W–31L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.87
4
Ann Copeland
58W–34L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%13%
3.86
Linda Lindberg
92W–69L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.78
4
Audra Hill
15W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Peggy Richardson
7W–8L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.58
Vicki Mello
50W–47L career · no lines in 2022
43%57%<1%
3.52
Karen Norton
23W–44L career · no lines in 2022
82%18%<1%
3.38
Susan Turner
3W–12L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
Mary Smeal
33W–26L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
Yvette Bolen
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.