Teams

SDNC 4.0 Valley Center/ Hendrix (3:1)

2022 Adult 40 & Over Winter- SDNC · SDNC - Women - 4.0

10 players · average NTRP 4.08 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-03-14vs SDNC 4.0 RBCTC/ Fisher (2:2)Lost 01
L#1 SinglesCHARLOTTE DEHESA vs TERESA FISHER3-6, 2-6
2022-03-07vs SDNC 4.0 Surf & Turf/ Talbert (2:2)Split 11
L#1 SinglesLilli Gibson vs Tisha Carney4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesCHARLOTTE DEHESA / Jennifer Richards vs Sarena Talbert / Dai Logan2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 SinglesLilli Gibson vs Michelle Crosby6-4, 0-6
2022-02-14Lost 01
L#2 DoublesHeather McNabb / Katherine Shadid vs Andrea Gillis / Brenda Iwamura1-6, 5-7
2022-01-31Won 10
W#1 SinglesLilli Gibson vs Lisa Davidson6-1, 6-4
2022-01-24Won 10
W#1 SinglesCHARLOTTE DEHESA vs Tina Riedell4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesLilli Gibson vs Christy Fritts4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesHeather McNabb / Katherine Shadid vs Julia Applebaum / Vicki Fitzgerald6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2022-01-10Won 10
W#1 SinglesLilli Gibson vs Anne Reese6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC - Women - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Angie Arnold
published 4.5
3.97
Shannon Dixon
published
3.85
Katherine Shadid
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.78
Becky Ness
published 4
Heather McNabb
published 4
3.73
CHARLOTTE DEHESA
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.73
Lilli Gibson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.73
Martina Masarani
published
3.31
Tanya Still
published
Sharon Morrison
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Angie Arnold + Shannon Dixon3939% games−7.3% vs expected
CHARLOTTE DEHESA + Lilli Gibson101049% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Angie Arnold
3W–9L career · no lines in 2022
58%42%<1%
3.97
Shannon Dixon
3W–9L career · no lines in 2022
58%42%<1%
3.97
4
Katherine Shadid
84W–59L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.85
4
Becky Ness
9W–4L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Heather McNabb
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
CHARLOTTE DEHESA
145W–114L career · 3 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Lilli Gibson
104W–61L career · 5 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
Martina Masarani
17W–6L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
Tanya Still
8W–4L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
Sharon Morrison
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.