Teams

Staub

2022 Harford Tri-Level 18 & Over · Harford Tri-Level 3.0,3.5,4.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2022-12-10vs FlemingWon 10
W#1 DoublesKathie Nichols / Stefanie Melcher vs Maria Remeta / Amy Allman3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-12-04vs DeneenSplit 11
W#2 DoublesStephanie Hutcheson / Kristin Seidl vs Christine Murphy / Sara Cabrera6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesStefanie Melcher / Leigh Williams vs Julieann Connelly / Janet Oldewurtel5-7, 6-7
2022-11-19vs FlemingLost 01
L#3 DoublesChristine Cloonan / Kathie Nichols vs Maria Remeta / Michelle Bailey-Hedgepeth2-6, 0-6
2022-11-13Lost 01
L#3 DoublesKathie Nichols / Leigh Williams vs Heather Hall / Christine Medvetz1-6, 2-6
2022-11-05vs FlemingWon 10
W#3 DoublesLeigh Williams / Christine Cloonan vs Amy Allman / Kathleen Thompson6-1, 7-6
2022-10-29vs DeneenLost 01
L#3 DoublesChristine Cloonan / Stefanie Melcher vs Erica Epple / Janet Oldewurtel4-6, 3-6
2022-10-15vs FlemingSplit 11
W#2 DoublesKristin Seidl / Stephanie Hutcheson vs Miriam Meller / Marion Meyers6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKathie Nichols / Leigh Williams vs Amy Allman / Michelle Bailey-Hedgepeth2-6, 0-6
2022-10-08vs DeneenLost 01
L#3 DoublesChristine Cloonan / Stefanie Melcher vs Julieann Connelly / Janet Oldewurtel1-6, 2-6
2022-10-01vs FlemingWon 10
W#3 DoublesStefanie Melcher / Kathie Nichols vs Amy Allman / Kathleen Thompson3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-09-28vs FlemingLost 01
L#3 DoublesChristine Cloonan / Stefanie Melcher vs Rebecca Pape / Tanya Svoboda6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2022-09-25vs DeneenLost 01
L#3 DoublesChristine Cloonan / Kathie Nichols vs Julieann Connelly / Robin Piazza6-2, 5-7, 0-1
2022-09-19vs DeneenLost 01
L#3 DoublesStefanie Melcher / Leigh Williams vs Erica Epple / Heather Hall2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Harford Tri-Level 3.0,3.5,4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Natalie Bryson
published
3.97
Danielle Barry
published 4.5
3.90
Cathy Preisendorfer
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.79
Kathy Pettus
published
3.31
Tracy Flaherty
published
3.05
Kristin Seidl
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.77
Christine Cloonan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.77
Stefanie Melcher
usually #3 Doubles 86%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 3
2.77
Kathie Nichols
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3
Nancy Der
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christine Cloonan + Stefanie Melcher51044% games+3.8% vs expected
Stefanie Melcher + Kathie Nichols5548% gamesnot enough data
Christine Cloonan + Kathie Nichols044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Natalie Bryson
9W–6L career · no lines in 2022
58%42%<1%
3.97
4.5
Danielle Barry
9W–25L career · no lines in 2022
60%40%<1%
3.97
4
Cathy Preisendorfer
147W–136L career · 10 lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
3.90
Kathy Pettus
1W–7L career · no lines in 2022
94%6%<1%
3.79
Tracy Flaherty
12W–19L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Kristin Seidl
66W–77L career · 2 lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.05
3
Christine Cloonan
49W–34L career · 6 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Stefanie Melcher
49W–45L career · 7 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Kathie Nichols
28W–44L career · 6 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
Nancy Der
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.