Teams

Kiwi - Raymond

2025 Brevard Adult 40 & Over · 2.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women

10 players · average NTRP 2.60 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-03-05vs Brevard/Woods/40&Over2.5WLost 03
L#1 DoublesLisa Sexton / Anne Burns vs Allison Moorhead / Lael Woods2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKatey Benne vs Cyndi Mcdougall0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCarla Norton / Stacy Konrad vs Eileen Bentley / Joanne Ringrose0-6, 2-6
2025-02-23vs Brevard/Woods/40&Over2.5WLost 03
L#1 DoublesJenifer Raymond / Donna Ford vs Lael Woods / Brenda Tarquinio3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesKatey Benne vs Cyndi Mcdougall4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAnne Burns / Carla Norton vs Eileen Bentley / Stephanie Lasko3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-01-29vs Brevard/Woods/40&Over2.5WLost 02
L#1 DoublesLisa Sexton / Anne Burns vs Lael Woods / Allison Moorhead3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesEdna Chism / Emily Burke vs Cyndi Mcdougall / Stephanie Lasko1-6, 1-6
2025-01-08vs Brevard/Woods/40&Over2.5WLost 12
L#1 DoublesJenifer Raymond / Anne Burns vs Cyndi Mcdougall / Julie Thalen4-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesLisa di Caprio vs Deborah Smith6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLisa Sexton / Emily Burke vs Joanne Ringrose / Linda Mesnard1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.28 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.53
Jenifer Raymond
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.38
Stacy Konrad
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.35
Donna Ford
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.27
Anne Burns
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.26
Lisa Sexton
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Carla Norton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Edna Chism
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.19
Katey Benne
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
1.96
Emily Burke
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Lisa di Caprio
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Sexton + Anne Burns044 matchesnot enough data
Donna Ford + Stacy Konrad134 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Sexton + Donna Ford213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jenifer Raymond
16W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%40%60%
2.53
Stacy Konrad
10W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
0%83%17%
2.38
3
Donna Ford
4W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
87%13%<1%
2.35
2.5
Anne Burns
10W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%96%4%
2.27
Lisa Sexton
6W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.26
2.5
Carla Norton
1W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Edna Chism
1W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Katey Benne
8W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.19
2.5
Emily Burke
5W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.96
Lisa di Caprio
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.