Teams

CSU GREEN

2023 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - NOCO · WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER - NOCO

10 players · average NTRP 4.12 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-17vs HMTC BRONZEWon 20
W#1 DoublesLynn Arenson / Kim Phillips vs Debra Netzel / Mary Wilson6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTonya Motley / Christine Houldsworth vs Renee Adams / Ann Smerud3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-07-10vs CSU GOLDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKim Phillips / Lynn Arenson vs Priscilla Dressen / Peggy Johnson6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesChristine Houldsworth / Ann Donahoo vs Erin Pasold / Cynthia McGrorey3-6, 6-7
2023-07-03vs LVTA TEALWon 30
W#1 DoublesKim Phillips / Amy Berkner vs Amy Ritchie / Wendy Thomas6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesLynn Arenson vs Elizabeth Gowins6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJan Keefe / Christine Houldsworth vs Valerie Hecker / Elizabeth Galligan6-1, 7-6
2023-06-26vs MLF ORANGEWon 10
W#1 DoublesKim Phillips / Amy Berkner vs Dee Woodcock / Lorena Laffitte6-1, 6-3
2023-06-19vs MLF YELLOWLost 12
W#1 DoublesAmy Berkner / Kim Phillips vs Carrie Galyardt / Becky Rosetti-Solley6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesTonya Motley / Lynn Arenson vs Trudy Samuelson / Emily Jones0-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesAnn Donahoo / Laurel McClellan vs Sarah Soffe / Annette Vizena4-6, 2-6
2023-06-12Lost 01
L#1 DoublesWendy Clark / Lynn Arenson vs Patti Lang / Melissa Myers2-6, 0-6
2023-06-05Won 10
W#3 DoublesLaurel McClellan / Ann Donahoo vs Carolyn Knape / Amy Anderson7-6, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.11
Amy Berkner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.83
Lynn Arenson
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.78
Kim Phillips
published
3.71
Christine Houldsworth
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Jill Hartman
published
3.66
Ann Donahoo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.57
Wendy Schaffer
published
3.46
Laurel McClellan
published
Jan Keefe
published
Tonya Motley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lynn Arenson + Kim Phillips3548% games−4.0% vs expected
Jill Hartman + Kim Phillips303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Amy Berkner
100W–54L career · 3 lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
4.11
4
Lynn Arenson
84W–58L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%88%12%
3.83
Kim Phillips
13W–12L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Christine Houldsworth
48W–39L career · 3 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.71
Jill Hartman
19W–18L career · no lines in 2023
<1%9%91%
3.68
4
Ann Donahoo
26W–16L career · 3 lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.66
Wendy Schaffer
13W–19L career · no lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.57
Laurel McClellan
2W–7L career · no lines in 2023
60%40%<1%
3.46
Jan Keefe
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tonya Motley
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.