Teams

Lucky in Love 55+ 6.0

2023 Howard Columbia Adult 55 & Over · Howard Columbia Adult 55 & Over 6.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.28 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2023-08-15vs Doubles or Nothing 55+ 6.0Split 11
L#1 DoublesKaren Spano / Cheryl Royce vs Kathy Greene / Christy Hull4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDebra MacDonald / Carole Veihmeyer vs Rayane Clark / Shari Albert3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-08-05vs Good & Plenty 55+ 6.0Split 11
L#2 DoublesDebra MacDonald / Andrea Smolen vs Jeannie Yep / Karen Jones0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesDenise Browne / DIANE CASANOVA vs Leslie MacFarlane / Mary Bielefeld6-2, 6-0
2023-08-01Lost 01
L#1 DoublesPam Henley / Marie Welsh vs Debbie Wall / Donna Jones5-7, 4-6
2023-07-25vs Good & Plenty 55+ 6.0Won 21
L#1 DoublesSophia Crawley / Cheryl Royce vs Stephanie Ruskin / Patricia Lopez2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesPam Henley / Marie Welsh vs Arianne Monroe / Sherry Lee7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDIANE CASANOVA / Denise Browne vs Rosemary Harty / Giovannina Dipietro6-3, 5-4
2023-07-24vs Doubles or Nothing 55+ 6.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesDenise Browne / Karen Spano vs Debbie Wall / Kathleen Stevens5-7, 6-5
L#2 DoublesThelma Leitzer-Kerr / Andrea Smolen vs Amy Champion / Rayane Clark6-7, 6-6
L#3 DoublesSophia Crawley / Debra MacDonald vs Renee Plazak / Gail Shenk3-6, 2-6
2023-07-22vs Doubles or Nothing 55+ 6.0Split 11
W#1 DoublesDebra MacDonald / Andrea Smolen vs Amy Champion / Ellen Hong7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDenise Browne / DIANE CASANOVA vs Jennifer Schied / Anne Schaefer6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2023-07-15vs Good & Plenty 55+ 6.0Won 21
W#1 DoublesDIANE CASANOVA / Karen Spano vs Arianne Monroe / Toni Vanderputten3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLeigh Tobin / Debra MacDonald vs Mary Bielefeld / Rosemary Harty6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesCheryl Royce / Maria Shearer vs Susan Houck / Yulin Henry4-6, 1-6
2023-07-12vs Good & Plenty 55+ 6.0Won 20
W#1 DoublesDebra MacDonald / Andrea Smolen vs Arianne Monroe / Giovannina Dipietro6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesPam Henley / Karen Spano vs Patricia Lopez / Susan Houck7-6, 4-4
2023-06-25vs Doubles or Nothing 55+ 6.0Won 20
W#1 DoublesDIANE CASANOVA / Denise Browne vs Lisa Greenlee / Ellen Hong6-4, 5-4
W#3 DoublesCheryl Royce / Marie Welsh vs April Wilmer / Jennifer Schied6-3, 6-4
2023-06-19vs Good & Plenty 55+ 6.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesDIANE CASANOVA / Maria Shearer vs Arianne Monroe / Yulin Henry7-6, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMarie Welsh / Pam Henley vs Leslie MacFarlane / Toni Vanderputten6-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAndrea Smolen / Thelma Leitzer-Kerr vs Giovannina Dipietro / Jeannie Yep6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Columbia Adult 55 & Over 6.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
DONALD CRAWLEY
usually #3 Doubles 54%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published 4
3.25
Marie Welsh
published
3.12
Debra MacDonald
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.12
Denise Browne
published 3.5
3.08
Cheryl Royce
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.02
Donna Slaughter
published 3.5
2.98
DIANE CASANOVA
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.88
Karen Spano
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.76
Andrea Smolen
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.69
Leigh Tobin
published
2.52
Pam Henley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Sophia Crawley
published
Thelma Leitzer-Kerr
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Spano + Debra MacDonald2551% gamesnot enough data
Andrea Smolen + Cheryl Royce3257% gamesnot enough data
Karen Spano + Pam Henley224 matchesnot enough data
Andrea Smolen + Leigh Tobin224 matchesnot enough data
Cheryl Royce + DIANE CASANOVA314 matchesnot enough data
Karen Spano + Cheryl Royce033 matchesnot enough data
Debra MacDonald + Andrea Smolen213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
DONALD CRAWLEY
473W–252L career · 13 lines in 2023
<1%87%12%
3.85
Marie Welsh
14W–10L career · no lines in 2023
2%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Debra MacDonald
213W–223L career · 10 lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Denise Browne
11W–23L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.12
3
Cheryl Royce
122W–139L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%26%74%
3.08
3.5
Donna Slaughter
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
3.02
3
DIANE CASANOVA
126W–105L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%58%42%
2.98
3
Karen Spano
88W–120L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
Andrea Smolen
170W–219L career · 5 lines in 2023
2%95%3%
2.76
Leigh Tobin
11W–14L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Pam Henley
49W–88L career · 4 lines in 2023
43%57%<1%
2.52
Sophia Crawley
4W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Thelma Leitzer-Kerr
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.