Teams

Eagle Landing - Brink

2026 Duval Combo 50 & Over · 6.5 W Sunday

18 players · average NTRP 3.25 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-16vs Southside - AtkinsWon 10
W#2 DoublesDiane Forhan / Jessica Acton vs Vicki Carden / Sandy Wedge6-4, 6-2
2026-08-09vs Jax Beach - WatersWon 30
W#1 DoublesLisa Rangeo / Rebecca Padgett vs Merlynn Kassing / Tina Toomey7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPATSY REYNOLDS / Maureen Ruiz vs Judith Daniel / Aura Bernal6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLaRee Moody / Kathy Evans vs Virginia Waters / Irene Perazzo4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-07-26vs Palencia - JimenezSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJudibelle Roman / Elizabeth Sotomayor vs Laura Jimenez / Anai Tipton3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDiane Forhan / Karen Meyer vs Doris Beaton / Julie Kilduff6-3, 6-3
2026-07-19vs Yards - ErenbergWon 21
W#1 DoublesJessica Acton / Diane Forhan vs Susan Marie Thornton HOLLIDAY / Loretta Noonan6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesPATSY REYNOLDS / Rebecca Padgett vs Alixe Stamatogiannakis / Alisa Worman2-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesLisa Rangeo / Maureen Ruiz vs Jessica Hall / Jan Horne6-0, 6-3
2026-07-12vs Eagle Harbor - JonesLost 01
L#2 DoublesKathy Evans / Diane Forhan vs Kandee Townsend / Erica Washkill1-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 W Sunday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Jessica Acton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
PATSY REYNOLDS
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Sherry Latta-Raines
published
Amarillys Rodriguez
published 3.5
3.22
Lisa Rangeo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.14
Karen Meyer
published
3.12
Judibelle Roman
published
3.11
Stacy Johns
published
3.01
Kendall Taylor
published
2.96
Diane Forhan
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.91
Maureen Ruiz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.83
Kathy Evans
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Susan Brink
published
2.70
Elizabeth Sotomayor
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Kelly Bryant
published
2.59
Rebecca Padgett
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.57
Mary Moody
published
LaRee Moody
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diane Forhan + Susan Brink4458% games+11.1% vs expected
PATSY REYNOLDS + Jessica Acton5073% gamesnot enough data
Diane Forhan + Rebecca Padgett314 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Sotomayor + Judibelle Roman404 matchesnot enough data
PATSY REYNOLDS + Maureen Ruiz224 matchesnot enough data
Maureen Ruiz + Rebecca Padgett224 matchesnot enough data
Diane Forhan + Maureen Ruiz213 matchesnot enough data
Kendall Taylor + Kathy Evans303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jessica Acton
12W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%59%41%
3.47
PATSY REYNOLDS
12W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
Sherry Latta-Raines
8W–0L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Amarillys Rodriguez
4W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Lisa Rangeo
22W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
3.22
Karen Meyer
8W–10L career · no lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.14
Judibelle Roman
12W–2L career · no lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
3.12
Stacy Johns
9W–2L career · no lines in 2026
<1%21%79%
3.11
Kendall Taylor
19W–13L career · no lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
3.01
3
Diane Forhan
19W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%61%38%
2.96
Maureen Ruiz
17W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
2.91
Kathy Evans
17W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
89%11%<1%
2.83
Susan Brink
14W–9L career · no lines in 2026
0%3%97%
2.77
Elizabeth Sotomayor
7W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
7%91%2%
2.70
Kelly Bryant
1W–6L career · no lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
2.63
Rebecca Padgett
16W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%25%75%
2.59
Mary Moody
13W–9L career · no lines in 2026
0%30%70%
2.57
LaRee Moody
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.