← Teams

GLVR-Crowley/Daoud

2022 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.14 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Miriam Habafy
usually #1 Singles 46%, also #3 Doubles 18% · published 3.5
3.22
Penny Langhammer
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3.5
2.84
Yone Akagi
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
—
Kate Maher
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.73
Amy Carolan
published 3
2.73
Kathleen Crowley
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.71
Katja Daoud
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
Results9 ties
2022-06-17Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesYone Akagi / Kate Quisling vs Robin Welter / Kerri Patrick6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKathleen Crowley / Jennifer Pultz vs Anne Stein-Gray / Rhonda Baker7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKathy Cooke / Katja Daoud vs Lucila Griesser / Robyn Hilden6-4, 6-0
2022-03-06Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesKathy Cooke / Katja Daoud vs Jenell Henson / Susanne Cochran6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMiriam Habafy vs Sumner Brooks7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLuz Zanavich / Kate Maher vs Allison Bader / SHAWNA THOMPSON6-1, 6-4
2022-02-27Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesKate Quisling / Yone Akagi vs Samanta Rodriguez Silva / Angela Diaz de Leon6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKathleen Crowley / Katherine Fisher vs Alyssa Rucker / Dorothy Cofield6-2, 7-6
W#2 SinglesKate Maher vs Sydney Smith7-6, 6-4
2022-02-12Won 4–0
W#1 DoublesKathy Cooke / Penny Langhammer vs Melissa Maxwell / Kristie Mills6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKate Quisling / Kate Maher vs Claudia Porter / Suzanne Massar6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesKatja Daoud vs Susan Wang6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKathleen Crowley / Tracy Moffett vs Lori Farrell / Keiko Okumura6-2, 6-1
2022-02-05Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesMiriam Habafy / Katja Daoud vs Chelsea Place / Valerie Neill6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesPenny Langhammer vs Christina Melander6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKathleen Crowley / Yone Akagi vs Rose Lee / Audrey Weil6-2, 6-4
2022-01-30Split 2–2
L#1 DoublesKathy Cooke / Kate Maher vs Jane King Ayers / Jing Li6-2, 7-6
W#1 SinglesMiriam Habafy vs Lupine Swanson7-6, 7-6
L#2 DoublesKatja Daoud / Yone Akagi vs Dipali Dixit / Jennifer Weaver6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKathleen Crowley / Tracy Moffett vs Marjorie Brinck / Victoria Chamberlain6-4, 7-6
2022-01-21Split 2–2
L#1 DoublesKathy Cooke / Kate Maher vs Barbara Gram / Sara Vanderhoff7-5, 6-0
W#1 SinglesMiriam Habafy vs Edwardeen Hilts6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKate Quisling / Yone Akagi vs Jennifer Stevenson / Melanie Morris6-4, 6-3
L#2 SinglesPenny Langhammer vs Sara Crate4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-01-15Split 1–1
W#1 SinglesPenny Langhammer vs Robin Burak6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKathleen Crowley / Yone Akagi vs Alana Rhea / Heidi Palena2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-01-09Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesKathy Cooke / Penny Langhammer vs Julia Henry / Michelle Ellett6-0, 7-6
W#1 SinglesMiriam Habafy vs Karin Owens6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKathleen Crowley / Yone Akagi vs Carol Glenn / Wendi Ouellette6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Miriam Habafy
105W–82L career
0%99%0%
3.26
3.5
Penny Langhammer
61W–36L career
2%97%0%
3.22
3
Yone Akagi
66W–52L career
0%98%2%
2.84
3
Kate Maher
36W–11L career
not enough data
—
3
Amy Carolan
30W–27L career
1%99%0%
2.73
3
Kathleen Crowley
60W–51L career
5%94%1%
2.73
3
Katja Daoud
71W–70L career
2%98%0%
2.71

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.