Teams

DIAMOND HILLS CM7.5A

2025 COMBO · Men 7.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-10-16vs ROUND HILL CC CM7.5BSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMoses Reyes / Bruno Oliveira vs Nash Robertson / Gary Cain7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAaron Lee / Diogennes Oliveira vs Matt Dublin / Richard Sipos6-1, 6-4
2025-08-29vs ROUND HILL CC CM7.5BLost 12
W#1 DoublesAaron Lee / Chris Adams vs Steve Meyer / Kevin Forster6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMoses Reyes / Bong Publico vs Chris Swany / Steve Brashear6-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJoel Belangdal / Gary Nelson Tolentino vs Warren Parti / Greg Pope4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Aaron Lee
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.56
Danny Pak
published 4
3.55
Joel Belangdal
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Chris Adams
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.50
Moses Reyes
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.39
Diogennes Oliveira
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Kshitij Ahuja
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Bong Publico
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Bruno Oliveira
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Gary Nelson Tolentino
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Andrew Carlin
published 3.5
Edwin Matabuena
published
Kessler Amores
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bruno Oliveira + Diogennes Oliveira6849% games+3.3% vs expected
Aaron Lee + Moses Reyes224 matchesnot enough data
Gary Nelson Tolentino + Chris Adams044 matchesnot enough data
Joel Belangdal + Moses Reyes314 matchesnot enough data
Kessler Amores + Moses Reyes224 matchesnot enough data
Gary Nelson Tolentino + Joel Belangdal123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Aaron Lee
21W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.93
4
Danny Pak
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
34%65%<1%
3.56
Joel Belangdal
11W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.55
3.5
Chris Adams
12W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%50%50%
3.50
Moses Reyes
17W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.50
Diogennes Oliveira
12W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
Kshitij Ahuja
7W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Bong Publico
4W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Bruno Oliveira
11W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.25
Gary Nelson Tolentino
14W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Andrew Carlin
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.04
Edwin Matabuena
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kessler Amores
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.