Teams

Give us a Tri

2023 Tri-Level League · Women 4.5, 4.0, 3.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.92 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Anna Studt
published 4.5
Catherine Herlich
published 4.5
3.84
Maria Chase
published
3.80
Zdenka Edgar
published
3.79
Ingrid Heinze
published 4
3.74
Susan Danielson
published
3.61
Norma Trevino
published
3.58
Sandy Collier
published
3.56
Kathryn Roohan
published
3.53
Constance Hassan
published 4
3.52
Roshawna Sloan
published 3.5
3.40
Renata Goebel
published
3.31
Stephanie Moreno
published
3.23
Mary Cirilo
published
3.08
Carolyn Cole
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Danielson + Zdenka Edgar5160% games+4.7% vs expected
Kathryn Roohan + Sandy Collier101243% games−1.6% vs expected
Constance Hassan + Norma Trevino134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Anna Studt
6W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Catherine Herlich
2W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Maria Chase
18W–17L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.84
Zdenka Edgar
31W–15L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Ingrid Heinze
18W–24L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.79
Susan Danielson
18W–23L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
Norma Trevino
13W–27L career · no lines in 2022
19%80%<1%
3.61
Sandy Collier
11W–12L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.58
Kathryn Roohan
10W–13L career · no lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
3.56
4
Constance Hassan
7W–15L career · no lines in 2022
40%60%<1%
3.53
3.5
Roshawna Sloan
94W–38L career · no lines in 2022
<1%44%56%
3.52
Renata Goebel
22W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.40
Stephanie Moreno
2W–15L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
Mary Cirilo
24W–81L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3
Carolyn Cole
16W–19L career · no lines in 2022
<1%27%73%
3.08

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.