Teams

WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 18AW4.0C-DT

2025 ADULT 18&Over - Daytime · Women 4.0

18 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Heidi Temkin
published
3.66
3.63
Viviana Meyer
published
3.54
Angela Logan
published 4
3.50
Tracey Hull
published
3.42
Jill Carlstrom
published
3.41
Sunita Mistry
published
3.38
Shashanna Singh
published
3.33
Shawn Young
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Susie Hansen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Heidi Kapust
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Tammy Nikoltcheva
published
3.21
Nanny Tunnell
published
3.18
Frances Donovan
published
3.14
Yolla Elahmadie
published
3.14
Trish Nornhold
published
3.12
Wendy Greer
published
Rachel Gilchrist
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sunita Mistry + Viviana Meyer5255% games+6.3% vs expected
Heidi Kapust + Jill Carlstrom5153% games+4.4% vs expected
Jill Carlstrom + Susie Hansen4160% games+1.1% vs expected
Shashanna Singh + Tracey Hull1634% games−8.1% vs expected
Shawn Young + Trish Nornhold224 matchesnot enough data
Shawn Young + Heidi Kapust134 matchesnot enough data
Rachel Gilchrist + Trish Nornhold044 matchesnot enough data
Heidi Temkin + Sunita Mistry033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Heidi Temkin
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.79
4
Cortny Christensen
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%1%
3.66
Viviana Meyer
14W–13L career · no lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.63
4
Angela Logan
28W–23L career · no lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.54
Tracey Hull
4W–10L career · no lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.50
Jill Carlstrom
16W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.42
Sunita Mistry
18W–14L career · no lines in 2025
74%26%<1%
3.41
Shashanna Singh
7W–15L career · no lines in 2025
81%19%<1%
3.38
Shawn Young
21W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
Susie Hansen
20W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
Heidi Kapust
18W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Tammy Nikoltcheva
7W–9L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Nanny Tunnell
5W–15L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Frances Donovan
6W–12L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Yolla Elahmadie
5W–18L career · no lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.14
Trish Nornhold
5W–14L career · no lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.14
Wendy Greer
14W–14L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.12
Rachel Gilchrist
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.