Teams

GEPTA/55&over/7.0MX/Daw/EPCC

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 USA MIXED 55 & OVER LEAGUE

17 players · average NTRP 3.33 / GEPTA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2026 USA MIXED 55 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Bill White
published 3.5
3.10
Chrissy Segaline
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.59
Diana Calhoun
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 42% · published 3
Ernesto Chauvet
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Greg Daw
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Javier Navarro
usually #1 Singles 44%, also #1 Doubles 28% · published
Karen McVay
usually #1 Doubles 47%, also #3 Doubles 32% · published
Kathy Cartwright
usually #3 Doubles 79%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
Laura Leslie
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Linda Kern
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Lourdes Livingston
usually #3 Doubles 39%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Paul Leslie
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Richard Lyon
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Richard Overley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Susan Daw
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Terry Calhoun
usually #3 Doubles 51%, also #2 Doubles 35% · published
Tina Gute
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paul Leslie + Bill White7455% games+9.2% vs expected
Terry Calhoun + Greg Daw91349% games+2.9% vs expected
Laura Leslie + Karen McVay5845% games−1.9% vs expected
Karen McVay + Kathy Cartwright5753% games−3.4% vs expected
Diana Calhoun + Susan Daw5947% gamesnot enough data
Kathy Cartwright + Terry Calhoun6361% gamesnot enough data
Tina Gute + Karen McVay4255% gamesnot enough data
Karen McVay + Bill White1536% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Bill White
28W–48L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Chrissy Segaline
21W–57L career · 9 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.10
3
Diana Calhoun
47W–57L career · 26 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
2.59
Ernesto Chauvet
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Greg Daw
65W–75L career · 21 lines in 2026
not enough data
Javier Navarro
28W–22L career · 18 lines in 2026
not enough data
Karen McVay
60W–86L career · 19 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kathy Cartwright
98W–60L career · 14 lines in 2026
not enough data
Laura Leslie
48W–65L career · 23 lines in 2026
not enough data
Linda Kern
37W–31L career · 15 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lourdes Livingston
45W–70L career · 18 lines in 2026
not enough data
Paul Leslie
85W–78L career · 24 lines in 2026
not enough data
Richard Lyon
7W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Richard Overley
11W–43L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Susan Daw
31W–30L career · 17 lines in 2026
not enough data
Terry Calhoun
76W–68L career · 37 lines in 2026
not enough data
Tina Gute
74W–62L career · 16 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.