Teams

ABoone-BP

2026 Eno River Combo 40 & Over · 40 & Over Combo 5.5 Women Wkd

13 players · average NTRP 2.88 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-22vs DBaker.40C-TOCHLost 12
W#1 DoublesMeghan Blake / Meredith Bazemore vs Kim Hutter / Amy Singer6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAnn Laros / Julie Roland vs Janet Ranheim / Emily Patulski1-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesJamie Scaglione / Megan Prieto vs Gretchen LoFrese / Nora Mishriky3-6, 0-6
2026-08-15vs PDavis.40.5.5C-DURLost 12
W#1 DoublesDelisa Ordronneau / Katy McReynolds vs Jean Cormier / Virginia Wang7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJamie Scaglione / Judith Mapstone vs Carin von Kahr / Christine Kruse1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCecilia Gonzales / Angela Boone vs Liz Schaller / Amanda Laird4-6, 6-7
2026-08-01vs DBaker.40C-TOCHLost 03
L#1 DoublesLiza Terll / Meredith Bazemore vs Debbie Baker / Susanne Schmal2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLori Salzmann / Katy McReynolds vs Kim Hutter / Emily Patulski6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesStephanie Amy / Angela Boone vs Gretchen LoFrese / Nora Mishriky5-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Combo 5.5 Women Wkd have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.57 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.97
Ann Laros
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.88
Liza Terll
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.81
Delisa Ordronneau
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.78
Meghan Blake
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.74
Jamie Scaglione
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.73
Lori Salzmann
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Cecilia Gonzales
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.50
Meredith Bazemore
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.47
Stephanie Amy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.42
Katy McReynolds
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.17
Megan Prieto
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.10
Julie Roland
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.10
Judith Mapstone
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Delisa Ordronneau + Meghan Blake6262% games−0.3% vs expected
Ann Laros + Liza Terll9754% games−0.5% vs expected
Lori Salzmann + Katy McReynolds0533% gamesnot enough data
Delisa Ordronneau + Liza Terll314 matchesnot enough data
Delisa Ordronneau + Katy McReynolds314 matchesnot enough data
Meredith Bazemore + Liza Terll134 matchesnot enough data
Delisa Ordronneau + Meredith Bazemore123 matchesnot enough data
Ann Laros + Meredith Bazemore303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Ann Laros
47W–38L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Liza Terll
76W–61L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
Delisa Ordronneau
31W–46L career · 1 line in 2026
1%92%7%
2.81
Meghan Blake
16W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
2%94%4%
2.78
3
Jamie Scaglione
27W–61L career · 7 lines in 2026
3%95%2%
2.74
3
Lori Salzmann
15W–25L career · 1 line in 2026
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Cecilia Gonzales
49W–89L career · 4 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
2.69
2.5
Meredith Bazemore
25W–29L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%51%49%
2.50
Stephanie Amy
4W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
60%40%<1%
2.47
2.5
Katy McReynolds
22W–36L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%72%28%
2.42
Megan Prieto
13W–27L career · 1 line in 2026
0%99%1%
2.17
Julie Roland
7W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.10
Judith Mapstone
0W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.10

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.