Teams

MO/Kim/40&Over7.0MXD

2023 Springfield Adult Mixed 40 & Over League · 7.0 Mixed

11 players · average NTRP 3.90 / MISSOURI

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-08-02vs Crull - SpringfieldWon 21
W#1 DoublesKara Spiva / Brent Morris vs Lorry Brown / Johan Collins2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLeslie Echols / Tony Roldan vs Karen Griffin / Jeff Marlin6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesHee-Sun Kim / Xingping Sun vs Tami Murphy / John Crull6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2023-07-26vs Crull - SpringfieldWon 20
W#1 DoublesLeslie Echols / Benjamin Mowris vs Lorry Brown / David Lane6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKara Spiva / Tony Roldan vs Carolyn Hanger / James Hanger2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-07-19vs Crull - SpringfieldWon 20
W#2 DoublesJane Gardner / Dennis Mailes vs Lorry Brown / Johan Collins6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCarol Mailes / Tony Roldan vs Carolyn Hanger / John Crull7-5, 6-2
2023-07-12vs Crull - SpringfieldWon 30
W#1 DoublesLeslie Echols / Brent Morris vs Karen Griffin / Jeff Marlin6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDebbie Pell / Benjamin Mowris vs Tami Murphy / James Hanger7-6, 7-5
W#3 DoublesHee-Sun Kim / Xingping Sun vs Katherine Vandeven / David Lane6-0, 6-1
2023-07-05vs Crull - SpringfieldWon 30
W#1 DoublesKara Spiva / Benjamin Mowris vs Katherine Vandeven / Johan Collins6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJane Gardner / Dennis Mailes vs Lorry Brown / David Lane6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesCarol Mailes / Tony Roldan vs Carolyn Hanger / James Hanger6-3, 7-6
2023-06-28vs Crull - SpringfieldWon 30
W#1 DoublesDebbie Pell / Brent Morris vs Lorry Brown / Johan Collins6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJane Gardner / Dennis Mailes vs Tami Murphy / John Crull6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCarol Mailes / Xingping Sun vs Karen Griffin / Jeff Marlin6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Benjamin Mowris
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Carol Mailes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Dennis Mailes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Hee-Sun Kim
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.56
Leslie Echols
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.33
Debbie Pell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.01
Jane Gardner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Brent Morris
published
Kara Spiva
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Tony Roldan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Xingping Sun
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dennis Mailes + Carol Mailes13958% gamesnot enough data
Dennis Mailes + Jane Gardner14071% gamesnot enough data
Leslie Echols + Benjamin Mowris5161% gamesnot enough data
Hee-Sun Kim + Tony Roldan224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Benjamin Mowris
25W–20L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Carol Mailes
55W–24L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Dennis Mailes
33W–13L career · type T · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Hee-Sun Kim
85W–75L career · 5 lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.75
Leslie Echols
111W–71L career · 7 lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.56
3.5
Debbie Pell
112W–89L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.33
Jane Gardner
57W–40L career · 3 lines in 2023
46%54%<1%
3.01
Brent Morris
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kara Spiva
36W–26L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Tony Roldan
17W–26L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Xingping Sun
13W–15L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.