← Teams

SHC-Thompson

2024 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.06 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Jenell Henson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.15
Ashley Sajadi
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 3
3.12
Melanie DeSilva
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.09
SHAWNA THOMPSON
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.96
Rachel Medrano
published 3
—
Anne Hamburg
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.64
Tracey Beagle
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.56
Gina Mandel
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.34
Carmen Timberlake
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Results8 ties
2024-06-23Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesTracey Beagle / Elicia Putnam vs Jane Nearn / Heather Edwards6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCarmen Timberlake / Bess Jacobo vs Christin Harrington / Heidi Cronn6-1, 6-0
2024-06-16Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesJenell Henson / Ashley Sajadi vs Jane Nearn / Heather Edwards6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKatie Simpson / Carmen Timberlake vs Melinee Steck / Natalie Mesnier6-0, 4-6, 1-0
2024-06-07Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesAshley Sajadi / Melanie DeSilva vs Mihee Park / Stephany Mo6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCarmen Timberlake / Debie Stellway vs Sarah Cariaga / Heather Dale6-2, 7-6
L#3 DoublesGina Mandel / Deena Bothello White vs Catherine Lofts / Jennifer Kim6-4, 7-6
2024-05-31Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesAshley Sajadi / SHAWNA THOMPSON vs Sarah Cariaga / Kimberly Downie6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJenell Henson vs Caroline Davidson6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesTracey Beagle / Carmen Timberlake vs Jennifer Kim / Catherine Lofts6-3, 6-2
2024-05-18Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesMelanie DeSilva / Elicia Putnam vs Joanna Asia Wagner / Shannon Davis6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAshley Sajadi vs Jessica Hutchins6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSHAWNA THOMPSON / Jenell Henson vs Michelle Cortez / Jennifer Oh7-5, 6-2
2024-05-11Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesSHAWNA THOMPSON / Elicia Putnam vs Michelle Ellett / Karin Owens6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesTeresa Metke / Gina Mandel vs Carol Glenn / Roxanna Johnson6-1, 6-3
2024-04-28Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesAshley Sajadi / Jenell Henson vs Amy Pickens / Kara Petracca6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesSHAWNA THOMPSON / Elicia Putnam vs Sumi Kim / Teresa Zhao6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesTracey Beagle / Debie Stellway vs Athena Rubin / Elena Walker3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2024-04-14Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesAmy Kaplan / Ashley Sajadi vs Sheila Sahu / Woojin Lee6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesGina Mandel / Anne Hamburg vs Minhhang Tran / Raquel Rich6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Jenell Henson
19W–15L career
5%93%2%
3.25
3
Ashley Sajadi
49W–34L career
0%37%63%
3.15
3.5
Melanie DeSilva
46W–38L career · type A
10%90%0%
3.12
3
SHAWNA THOMPSON
74W–35L career
0%55%45%
3.09
3
Rachel Medrano
20W–14L career
0%85%15%
2.96
3
Anne Hamburg
7W–14L career
not enough data
—
3
Tracey Beagle
17W–28L career
13%86%0%
2.64
3
Gina Mandel
21W–32L career
30%70%1%
2.56
2.5
Carmen Timberlake
43W–76L career
0%76%24%
2.34

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.