Teams

15 MAC Morgan 8.0

2025 Richmond Mixed 18 & Over · Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 8.0

21 players · average NTRP 4.06 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-03-22vs 13 MTC Scammell 8.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesGreg Deeb / Lindsay Hardage vs Dana Fath / Fahim Rahman6-3, 6-4
2025-03-08vs 9 Burkwood Kampinga 8.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMarcy Kozlowski / Warren Smigo vs Meredith White / Michael Hazelwood2-6, 6-0, 0-1
2025-03-02vs 3 ACAC Delisio 8.0Won 20
W#1 DoublesWayne Motley / Philathea Cole vs Glenn Pfluger / Dina Weddle6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDon Busick / Lindsay Hardage vs Christina Aeinan Kang / Andrew Yu6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2025-02-22vs 23 Raintree Earle 8.0Lost 01
L#3 DoublesGreg Deeb / Lindsay Hardage vs Alex Darragh / Janice McGarity6-7, 3-5
2025-02-08vs 1 MAC Messmer 8.0Won 20
W#2 DoublesSung Kang / Stacey Cabral vs Carol Gregory / Tom Rider7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesWarren Smigo / Rebecca Haener vs Kasey Hammond / Ken Hammond6-2, 6-3
2025-02-02vs 11 Herm Orski 8.0Won 20
W#2 DoublesDon Busick / Lindsay Hardage vs Albert Thomas / Brittany Nichols7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMegan Abel / Alex Neuwelt vs Daniel Sadusky / Kim Magnano6-2, 6-0
2025-01-25vs 5 Westwood Coleman 8.0Won 20
W#1 DoublesPhilathea Cole / Wayne Motley vs Sarah Oatts / Charles Cosby7-5, 5-4
W#3 DoublesMegan Abel / Alex Neuwelt vs Walker Reid / Katherine Coleman7-5, 5-4
2025-01-19vs 7 ACAC Kim 8.0Won 10
W#3 DoublesLindsay Hardage / Warren Smigo vs Sarah Rowe / Paul Davis7-6, 5-5
2025-01-11vs 21 Willow Oaks Hale 8.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesPhilathea Cole / Wayne Motley vs Maureen Blackwood / Terence Blackwood6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-01-05vs 17 Westwood Hause/Kelly 8.0Won 10
W#3 DoublesSung Kang / Stacey Cabral vs Elizabeth Kelly / Brian Holder6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.85 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.68
Jamie Cochrane
published
Craig Morgan
published 4.5
4.19
Sung Kang
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.18
Rebecca Haener
published
4.14
Wayne Motley
published
4.06
Rycy Godette
published
4.04
Alex Neuwelt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.90
Marcy Kozlowski
published
3.89
Jonathan McDorman
published
3.86
James Holland
published
3.83
Don Busick
published
3.78
Pearl Horng
published
3.77
Keith Adams
published
3.77
Aric Mueller
published 4
3.74
Lindsay Hardage
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 4
3.69
Warren Smigo
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.39
Megan Abel
published
3.39
Stacey Cabral
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.02
Philathea Cole
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Greg Deeb
published
Samuel Holley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Warren Smigo + Lindsay Hardage314 matchesnot enough data
Sung Kang + Stacey Cabral404 matchesnot enough data
Rycy Godette + Wayne Motley044 matchesnot enough data
Wayne Motley + Philathea Cole134 matchesnot enough data
Samuel Holley + Lindsay Hardage303 matchesnot enough data
Lindsay Hardage + Don Busick213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jamie Cochrane
7W–3L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.68
4.5
Craig Morgan
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Sung Kang
202W–85L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
4.19
Rebecca Haener
15W–17L career · no lines in 2025
9%89%1%
4.18
Wayne Motley
9W–20L career · no lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
4.14
Rycy Godette
6W–9L career · no lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
4.06
4.5
Alex Neuwelt
260W–118L career · 2 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
4.04
Marcy Kozlowski
19W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.90
Jonathan McDorman
8W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.89
James Holland
28W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%15%
3.86
Don Busick
9W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
Pearl Horng
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
Keith Adams
15W–11L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Aric Mueller
13W–17L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Lindsay Hardage
93W–63L career · 10 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.74
4
Warren Smigo
72W–158L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.69
Megan Abel
8W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Stacey Cabral
217W–103L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Philathea Cole
72W–89L career · type A · 6 lines in 2025
43%56%<1%
3.02
Greg Deeb
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Samuel Holley
16W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.