Teams

Everything Bagels W4.0

2023 Montgomery Singles Summer · Montgomery Singles 4.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.92 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-08-31vs My HOmiesLost 02
L#1 SinglesMia Piansay vs Allison Papadopoulos1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesTina Halley vs Robin Burton3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2023-08-22vs SoloistsLost 01
L#2 SinglesTina Halley vs Sara Orthwein2-6, 5-7
2023-08-17vs My HOmiesLost 02
L#1 SinglesChanpen Teeranon vs Alexis McCary5-7, 4-5
L#2 SinglesTina Halley vs Robin Burton4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-08-11vs SoloistsWon 10
W#2 SinglesHeather Sine vs Aline Rodriguez6-7, 4-4
2023-08-08vs My HOmiesSplit 11
W#1 SinglesElena Molchanova vs Alexis McCary6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 SinglesHeather Sine vs Allison Papadopoulos4-6, 3-6
2023-08-02vs SoloistsSplit 11
L#1 SinglesElena Molchanova vs Sara Orthwein3-6, 4-3
W#3 SinglesHeather Sine vs Maria Vassileva7-6, 3-4
2023-07-20vs SoloistsLost 12
L#1 SinglesElena Molchanova vs Sara Orthwein2-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesChanpen Teeranon vs Maria Vassileva6-4, 5-5
L#3 SinglesMia Piansay vs Kelsey Forbes2-6, 2-6
2023-07-17vs My HOmiesLost 01
L#1 SinglesChanpen Teeranon vs Kristin Quackenbush1-6, 0-6
2023-07-08vs SoloistsLost 02
L#1 SinglesChanpen Teeranon vs Eboni Lance1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesTina Halley vs Sara Orthwein4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Singles 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
Heather Sine
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4.5
3.88
Tina Halley
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.74
Cecilia Jones
published 4
3.74
Chanpen Teeranon
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.72
Riette van Laack
published
3.68
Jelena Mitrovic
published
3.60
Kirah Yen
published
3.50
Elena Molchanova
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Mia Piansay
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Heather Sine
293W–174L career · 3 lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
4.03
4
Tina Halley
128W–66L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.88
4
Cecilia Jones
48W–52L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Chanpen Teeranon
209W–208L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.74
Riette van Laack
7W–2L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.72
Jelena Mitrovic
9W–11L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.68
Kirah Yen
42W–29L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.60
3.5
Elena Molchanova
145W–82L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%51%49%
3.50
3.5
Mia Piansay
244W–303L career · 2 lines in 2023
5%93%1%
3.21

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.