Teams

TeamForman (Riviera Prep)

2022 Miami-Dade Combo 18 & Over - Night · 5.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-08-11vs Miami-Dade/GaryLost 01
L#1 DoublesJudy Prado / Nathalia Blanco vs Zule Abad / Beth Story3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2022-08-09vs Sevilla Tennis (Continental)Won 10
W#2 DoublesDaniella Reynolds / Nathalia Blanco vs Jennifer Roque / Nicole Ruiz6-1, 6-2
2022-08-04vs Alkhaldi (Taco Tennis)Won 10
W#1 DoublesJessica Rojas / Nathalia Blanco vs Marjorie Cecchi / Kalina Castro6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2022-07-26vs Genece-Oloye (Coral Reef)Won 10
W#2 DoublesJessica Rojas / Nathalia Blanco vs Virginia Ferrari / Fiorella Warger6-1, 7-6
2022-07-19vs Thayer (Coral Reef)Won 10
W#3 DoublesJessica Rojas / Veronica Estrada vs Beatriz Terry / Christine Edwards7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2022-07-05vs Sevilla Tennis (Continental)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesCarolina Jacquemin / Jessica Rojas vs Meredith Kallaher / Lisette Trimble3-6, 4-6
2022-06-20vs Rodriguez (Alper JCC)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesANGELA MUSSO / Nathalia Blanco vs Jeannie Serrano / Marcela Galvis6-2, 6-7, 0-1
2022-06-14vs Thayer (Coral Reef)Won 10
W#3 DoublesNathalia Blanco / Allyssa Cili vs Ana Romero Nunez / Paula Connor6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Emily Burrows
published 4
Deanna Etzold
published 4
3.51
Nathalia Blanco
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.41
Valerie Berrin
published
3.34
Alejandra Taylor
published 3.5
3.25
Claudia Donnelly
published 3.5
3.11
Veronica Estrada
published
3.09
Paola Campanella
published
2.58
Jessica Rojas
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.53
Nicky Goldner
published
Jane Forman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nathalia Blanco + Valerie Berrin9165% games+7.1% vs expected
Nathalia Blanco + Jessica Rojas303 matchesnot enough data
Alejandra Taylor + Claudia Donnelly303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Emily Burrows
12W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
3.92
4
Deanna Etzold
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Nathalia Blanco
323W–115L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%47%53%
3.51
Valerie Berrin
33W–20L career · no lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
3.41
3.5
Alejandra Taylor
16W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Claudia Donnelly
20W–10L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
Veronica Estrada
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
>99%<1%<1%
3.11
Paola Campanella
13W–8L career · no lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
3.09
2.5
Jessica Rojas
44W–30L career · 4 lines in 2022
0%27%73%
2.58
Nicky Goldner
5W–6L career · no lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
2.53
Jane Forman
13W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.