Teams

NRS - Karin

2021 IRMSL Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 WOMEN

9 players · average NTRP 4.50 / REGION_6

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-03-17Lost 02
L#1 SinglesReinalyn Albrecht vs Ruth Ann Nordgren3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRebecca Fulper / Amy Manuel vs Beth Grossnickle / Elisabeth Smith3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2021-02-28Lost 01
L#2 DoublesChristina Lovera / Rebecca Fulper vs Michele Modica / Mary Kritz3-6, 6-7
2021-02-24Won 10
W#1 DoublesRebecca Fulper / Christina Lovera vs Gretchen Brown / Karen Schmieder4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-02-10vs IRMSL - Buttonwood/Sandy PalmaSplit 11
W#1 DoublesChristina Lovera / Rebecca Fulper vs Cynthia DiNenna / Deborah LeClaire6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJerri Brennan / Lynda Emilson vs Theresa Dubiel / Abigail Flood2-6, 1-6
2021-02-03vs Boulevard - OrthoberWon 20
W#1 DoublesRebecca Fulper / Christina Lovera vs Gretchen Brown / Terry Tillman3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLynda Emilson / Jerri Brennan vs Kristin Hazelton / Alison Feagin6-0, 6-4
2021-01-27vs Vbtc - ModicaWon 10
W#1 DoublesChristina Lovera / Rebecca Fulper vs Lydia Kennedy / Charlotte Higgins6-4, 7-6
2021-01-20vs IRMSL - Buttonwood/Sandy PalmaLost 01
L#2 DoublesSharon DeGaetano / Rebecca Fulper vs Angela Cramer / Sandy Palma2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2021-01-16vs Boulevard - OrthoberSplit 11
W#1 DoublesChristina Lovera / Rebecca Fulper vs Wendy Orthober / Claudia Berk6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMary Murray / Reinalyn Albrecht vs Kate Simpson / Leslie London6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Christina Lovera
published 4.5
4.00
Sharon DeGaetano
published
3.41
Reinalyn Albrecht
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.31
Jerri Brennan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lisa Thiesen
published
Mary Murray
published
Patricia Brimlow
published
Rebecca Fulper
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Susan Dennett
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Christina Lovera
1W–5L career · no lines in 2021
35%65%<1%
4.05
Sharon DeGaetano
5W–6L career · no lines in 2021
51%49%<1%
4.00
Reinalyn Albrecht
33W–57L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%75%25%
3.41
Jerri Brennan
57W–70L career · 2 lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.31
Lisa Thiesen
2W–11L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Mary Murray
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Patricia Brimlow
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Rebecca Fulper
61W–61L career · 8 lines in 2021
not enough data
Susan Dennett
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.