Teams

TIBURON PEN C 18AM4.0A

2023 ADULT 18&Over · Men's 4.0

16 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2023-05-27vs RAFAEL RC 18AM4.0ALost 01
L#3 DoublesDavid Sherry / Colin O'Brien vs Nick Notti / Paul McGeehan0-6, 3-6
2023-05-20vs MILL VALLEY 18AM4.0ALost 01
L#3 DoublesDavid Galloreese / Colin O'Brien vs Lucas Hatch / Brian Weisman1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Henry Homes
published 4
3.91
Jeffrey Webb
published
3.91
Jesse Eisenhardt
published
3.89
Lewis Kaufman
published
3.87
Brett Mulberg
published 4
Christopher Kim
published 4
3.74
David Sherry
published 4
3.70
Jeff Barcy
published
3.60
Ross Seymore
published
3.57
Troy Pewitt
published
3.52
Richard Greenberg
published
3.48
Jordan Warren
published
3.37
Shannon Phillips
published
Colin O'Brien
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Jonathan Golden
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jordan Warren + Jeff Barcy033 matchesnot enough data
Troy Pewitt + Jeff Barcy213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Henry Homes
3W–0L career · no lines in 2023
<1%17%83%
4.12
4.5
Carlos Gonzalez de Villaumbrosia
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
55%45%<1%
3.98
Jeffrey Webb
6W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
3.91
Jesse Eisenhardt
6W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%24%
3.91
Lewis Kaufman
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.89
4
Brett Mulberg
6W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
3.87
4
Christopher Kim
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
David Sherry
2W–9L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.74
Jeff Barcy
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.70
Ross Seymore
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.60
Troy Pewitt
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.57
Richard Greenberg
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
3.52
Jordan Warren
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
55%45%<1%
3.48
Shannon Phillips
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
85%15%<1%
3.37
3.5
Colin O'Brien
24W–22L career · 8 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jonathan Golden
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.