Teams

Haigler - RS Clay

2024 Escambia Combo 50 & Over · 6.5 Combo 50 & Over - Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.42 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-12-14vs Tran - RS ClaySplit 11
W#1 DoublesJerry Clark / A Haigler vs KL LeCOQ / Robert Cruise6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesCraig Abel / Jim Smith vs Kenneth Wallace / Tracy Schmidt7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2024-12-07vs Tran - RS ClayWon 10
W#1 DoublesJames Richardson / Jerry Clark vs James Holmes / Victor Agadzi6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2024-11-16vs Tran - RS ClayLost 01
L#2 DoublesCraig Abel / Jim Smith vs James Holmes / Victor Agadzi6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2024-11-09vs Tran - RS ClayLost 01
L#3 DoublesKen McCurdy / Jerry Clark vs Donald Herip / Jonathan Llanera4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-10-30vs Tran - RS ClayWon 10
W#1 DoublesJerry Clark / James Richardson vs Kenneth Wallace / Victor Agadzi6-2, 6-1
2024-10-26vs Tran - RS ClaySplit 11
W#1 DoublesJames Richardson / Jerry Clark vs Donald Herip / Tracy Schmidt6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesGregory Gill / Jim Smith vs Jonathan Llanera / Ed Souza3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Combo 50 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Ken McCurdy
published
3.57
James Richardson
published 4
3.55
Nick Farkas
published
3.45
Gregory Gill
published 3.5
3.36
Eric Stewart
published 3.5
3.27
Craig Abel
published 3.5
3.21
Jerry Clark
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.88
Beau Bullard
published 3
2.79
A Haigler
published 3
2.72
Jim Smith
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Craig Abel + Gregory Gill4254% games+0.9% vs expected
Jim Smith + Jerry Clark303 matchesnot enough data
Nick Farkas + Craig Abel303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ken McCurdy
18W–15L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.67
4
James Richardson
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.57
Nick Farkas
50W–21L career · no lines in 2024
<1%35%65%
3.55
3.5
Gregory Gill
13W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%65%35%
3.45
3.5
Eric Stewart
19W–22L career · no lines in 2024
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Craig Abel
21W–21L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.27
Jerry Clark
145W–79L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%5%95%
3.21
3
Beau Bullard
8W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
A Haigler
7W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
2.79
Jim Smith
83W–69L career · 3 lines in 2024
5%94%1%
2.72

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.