Teams

2.TOC.Irish

2022 CTRL Adult 40 & Over · Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.21 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-04-30vs 5.TOC.MillerWon 20
W#1 SinglesKeely Williams vs Kristen Wynns7-6, 7-6
W#2 DoublesNan Hu / Pamela Godwin vs Robyn Merck / Kelly Crawford7-5, 6-0
2022-04-23vs 1.CAS.WigginsWon 20
W#1 DoublesKeely Williams / Yvonne Acker vs Charity Bare / Stephanie Phelps7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesNan Hu / Pamela Godwin vs Tina Krasner / Tina Wiggins6-1, 6-1
2022-04-02vs 4.TOC.KempfLost 02
L#2 DoublesKeely Williams / Caroline Irish vs Lisa Kempf / Jessica Phillips0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCarol Wooten / Pamela Godwin vs Carolina Robayo / Betsy Fulcher0-6, 2-6
2022-03-26vs 6.TOHS.RiderLost 01
L#2 DoublesKeely Williams / Janet Phillips vs Kelly Townsend / Laura Ross5-7, 3-6
2022-03-12vs 5.TOC.MillerLost 01
L#1 DoublesYvonne Acker / Cecily Peterson vs Suzanne Miller / Miho Ogura3-6, 1-6
2022-03-05Lost 12
L#1 DoublesYvonne Acker / Regina Davis vs Charity Bare / Tina Wiggins7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesCecily Peterson vs Holly Thomann0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesPamela Godwin / Jennifer Magee vs Rebecca Lycan / Cathy Scheer7-5, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Emily Childs
published 4
3.41
Nan Hu
published
3.21
Regina Davis
published
3.11
Sheila Newton
published
3.10
Yvonne Acker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.04
Cecily Peterson
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 3
2.89
Keely Williams
usually #1 Singles 38%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.77
Pamela Godwin
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.69
Carol Wooten
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cecily Peterson + Yvonne Acker134 matchesnot enough data
Pamela Godwin + Yvonne Acker134 matchesnot enough data
Regina Davis + Yvonne Acker123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Emily Childs
39W–42L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.68
Nan Hu
7W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
3.41
Regina Davis
36W–56L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21
Sheila Newton
8W–11L career · no lines in 2022
19%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Yvonne Acker
128W–167L career · 3 lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.10
3
Cecily Peterson
209W–207L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%37%63%
3.04
3
Keely Williams
186W–157L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
2.89
3
Pamela Godwin
50W–60L career · 8 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Allison Stewart-Smull
3W–12L career · type A · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Carol Wooten
4W–13L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.