Teams

BBrown (Park Crossing)

2026 Combo Doubles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.21 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-21vs CMcKiernan (Raintree)Won 21
L#1 DoublesRhonda Cantrell / Jocelyn Zuehlke vs Mindy Zimmerman / Tricia Shaw4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJinna Harmon / Tatiana Thomas vs Susan Chandler / Ciara McKiernan3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRebecca Brown / Suzanne Hair vs Christine Demille / Nicole Love6-3, 6-2
2026-08-14vs KCox (MPCC)Won 21
L#1 DoublesJinna Harmon / Danielle Hutcheson vs Jennifer Farrell / Torey Parsons6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDiane Harrington / Tish Macuga vs Catherine Hensley / Amanda Cash6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMarion Mande / Tatiana Thomas vs Katie Cox / Rebecca Drendel6-3, 6-4
2026-08-07vs SStroud/MMetzl (Sardis)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJinna Harmon / Jocelyn Zuehlke vs Sharon Storck / Jessica Walker2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRebecca Brown / Jaime Graham vs Amie Caudle / Starr Stroud1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJenny Beacham / Suzanne Hair vs Martha Metzl / Christina Wright4-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings44 teams · 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SAliota/CBauer (Carmel)2060243
2VWade/KCollins (Jeff Adams)2051229
3SStroud/MMetzl (Sardis)2051224
4LDyer (Mountainbrook)2042548
5JWoodruff (CSRC)2042555
6LPratt/CPrejean (Lifetime)1030012
7MMcHugh (Queens)1030012
8KCronin/LFerguson (Piper Glen)1030113
9SGrindle (WSRC)1021217
10CAckels (PCC)1021226
11KRichards (Raintree)1021220
12SNewman (BCC)1021218
13BDunn (PPRSC)1021217
14JJZhu (Park Road)1021326
15KOShea/RFitzsimons (Carmel)1021326
16EBass/LThompson (Sardis)1021323
17LDiman/Magee (Carmel)1021322
18JCarlsen (River Hills Country Club)1021427
19JHerlong/LOCallaghan (FCC)1142446
20KCox (MPCC)1142555
21SChandra (Charlotte Tennis - Sharon Lakes)1142547
22LHuntington (Park Road)1133648
23AMilas (OPRC)1133751
24KGreathouse (Russell)1124863
25BBrown (Park Crossing)1124857
26VTolson/Petras (FCC)000000
27CChilds (Blakeney)000000
28SNester/SHarris (Windyrush)000000
29AHall (Raintree)0112428
30SDurovic/Wilson (Palisades)0112430
31LAndersen/SGossert (Shannamara)0112428
32TMermans/JPetrikis (WSRC)0112425
33JFontaine/Inga (Life Time)0112535
34MTurturro (OPRC)0112537
35ACutts (WSRC)0112528
36CMcKiernan (Raintree)0103638
37THyso (Life Time)0103634
38VBorkey (Pine Lake CC)0103636
39ACheek/KBissett (Piper Glen)0103632
40VPomfrey (Rolling Hills)0224961
41DPorter/Fuller (Carmel)02151068
42CMiller (Charlotte CC)02151067
43ATrexler/LPelletier (Queens)02151072
44ASmith (OPRC)02151065

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Cherie Bouchon
published 3.5
3.29
Diane Harrington
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Jinna Harmon
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
Marion Mande
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Rhonda Cantrell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.99
Jaime Graham
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Danielle Hutcheson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.93
Allison Woerner
published 3
2.92
Suzanne Hair
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Tatiana Thomas
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.83
Tish Macuga
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.70
Jenny Beacham
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Jocelyn Zuehlke
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tish Macuga + Jocelyn Zuehlke3746% gamesnot enough data
Jinna Harmon + Jocelyn Zuehlke0537% gamesnot enough data
Tatiana Thomas + Tish Macuga404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cherie Bouchon
2W–1L career · no lines in 2026
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Diane Harrington
6W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Jinna Harmon
18W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
Marion Mande
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
Rhonda Cantrell
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.06
Jaime Graham
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%53%47%
2.99
3
Danielle Hutcheson
8W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Allison Woerner
2W–1L career · no lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.93
Suzanne Hair
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
2.92
Tatiana Thomas
9W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.89
3
Tish Macuga
74W–75L career · 1 line in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
Jenny Beacham
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
7%91%2%
2.70
3
Jocelyn Zuehlke
63W–68L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.69

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.