Teams

CLAREMONT R and S 40AW4.0A

2024 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 4.0

18 players · average NTRP 4.17 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.39
Sara Schipani
published
4.05
Jamie Addington
published
4.03
Ana Larner
published 4
4.02
Brooke Frederick
published 4.5
3.96
Jennifer Vice
published
3.92
Rachel Gabato
published
3.79
3.74
Lisa Laanisto
published
3.74
Sally Fitzhugh
published
3.63
Stephanie Shapiro
published
3.52
3.50
Holly Cole
published
3.47
Ina Bendich
published
3.42
Jennifer Leebove
published
3.38
Kimia Zucker
published
Lauren Dutton
published
Pinkie Flad
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rachel Gabato + Rosemary Cowen-Knight033 matchesnot enough data
Judy Gonzalez-Massih + Stephanie Shapiro123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sara Schipani
11W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
4.39
Jamie Addington
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
35%65%<1%
4.05
4
Ana Larner
42W–25L career · no lines in 2024
<1%42%58%
4.03
4.5
Brooke Frederick
12W–5L career · no lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
4.02
Jennifer Vice
15W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%61%39%
3.96
Rachel Gabato
2W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
3.92
4
Alanna Coopersmith
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.79
Lisa Laanisto
6W–9L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.74
Sally Fitzhugh
10W–18L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.74
Stephanie Shapiro
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
3.63
Rosemary Cowen-Knight
3W–11L career · no lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
3.52
Holly Cole
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
50%50%<1%
3.50
Ina Bendich
3W–15L career · no lines in 2024
58%42%<1%
3.47
Jennifer Leebove
1W–6L career · no lines in 2024
72%28%<1%
3.42
Judy Gonzalez-Massih
4W–14L career · no lines in 2024
81%19%<1%
3.38
Kimia Zucker
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lauren Dutton
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Pinkie Flad
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.