Teams

Slice and Dice

2025 OKCMixed 18 & Over League · 7.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.83 / OKLAHOMA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-06-29vs Doughty/WoodLost 02
L#1 DoublesAlise Day / Silas Day vs Haven Willis / Fred Lueck6-7, 7-6
L#2 DoublesKatherine Barton / Paul Jones vs Natalie Haymaker / Ryan Hanson1-6, 3-6
2025-06-22vs Smith 7.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJeffrey Gonzales / Katherine Barton vs Cody Yamamoto / Lucia Chavez3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDon Pham / Grace Mulligan vs Andrew Smith / Thi Nguyen5-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesPaul Jones / Chelsea Ragland vs Nayeli de Loera / Colton Miller3-6, 0-6
2025-06-08vs High FivesLost 12
L#1 DoublesSilas Day / Srividhya Muralidharan vs Laura Tirrell / Brian Ward5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJeffrey Gonzales / Katherine Barton vs Mark Hybers / Sunkyoung So6-0, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDon Pham / Gayle MacKenzie-Morain vs Clancy Tresemer / Tripp Cunningham5-7, 7-6, 0-1
2025-06-01vs MOVALLEY/Patel/MIXED18&over7.0XSplit 11
W#1 DoublesGayle MacKenzie-Morain / Don Pham vs Alex Porter / Leslie Lopez6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRafael Martinez / Chelsea Ragland vs Brad Jimeson / Sarah Rahim0-6, 2-6
2025-05-18vs Volly Llamas 7.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesJeffrey Gonzales / Katherine Barton vs Gustavo Hernandez / Tiara Amantine3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesGrace Mulligan / Don Pham vs Michael Miller / Rosa Young6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesRafael Martinez / Srividhya Muralidharan vs Patrick Skinner / Patricia Truong1-6, 0-6
2025-05-04vs Doughty/WoodLost 12
W#1 DoublesGayle MacKenzie-Morain / Silas Day vs Jennifer Hasselwander / Neil Molina7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAlise Day / Jeffrey Gonzales vs Rhonda Lincoln / Patrick Doughty6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesGrace Mulligan / Don Pham vs Haven Willis / Fred Lueck3-6, 0-6
2025-04-27vs Smith 7.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesJeffrey Gonzales / Srividhya Muralidharan vs Phillip Baker / Brandi Russell3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesGrace Mulligan / Don Pham vs Susan Bouzerand / Stephen Smith6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesSilas Day / Gayle MacKenzie-Morain vs Amy Laizure / Cody Yamamoto4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-04-13vs High FivesWon 30
W#1 DoublesGrace Mulligan / Don Pham vs Kelly Bishop / Clancy Tresemer6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChelsea Ragland / Rafael Martinez vs Brian Ward / Laura Tirrell4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAlise Day / Silas Day vs Kirk Purnell / Brenda Hise6-3, 6-1
2025-04-06vs MOVALLEY/Patel/MIXED18&over7.0XLost 03
L#1 DoublesJeffrey Gonzales / Sophie Goforth vs Sarah Patel / David Ellis7-5, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRafael Martinez / Srividhya Muralidharan vs Alex Porter / Leslie Lopez1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDon Pham / Grace Mulligan vs Cassie Gonzalez / Percy Young1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Silas Day
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.34
Chelsea Ragland
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.29
Alise Day
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Katherine Barton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.17
Don Pham
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
3.03
Gayle MacKenzie-Morain
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.95
Srividhya Muralidharan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Grace Mulligan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Jeffrey Gonzales
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Paul Jones
published
Rafael Martinez
published
Sophie Goforth
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Srividhya Muralidharan + Alise Day4157% games−3.5% vs expected
Don Pham + Grace Mulligan3349% gamesnot enough data
Don Pham + Silas Day4154% gamesnot enough data
Jeffrey Gonzales + Katherine Barton123 matchesnot enough data
Jeffrey Gonzales + Chelsea Ragland213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Silas Day
77W–32L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Chelsea Ragland
57W–41L career · 8 lines in 2025
87%13%<1%
3.34
3.5
Alise Day
82W–52L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
Katherine Barton
15W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%4%96%
3.24
Don Pham
27W–15L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%12%88%
3.17
Gayle MacKenzie-Morain
46W–78L career · 4 lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.03
Srividhya Muralidharan
40W–42L career · 4 lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
2.95
Grace Mulligan
5W–5L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jeffrey Gonzales
33W–22L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Paul Jones
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rafael Martinez
14W–10L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sophie Goforth
10W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.